AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Vu Phan

MATH124 · MATH2A · MATH21 · MATH3B · MATH2 · 2A · MATH10 · MATH3A · 76 lifetime ratings

AI rating
87/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
84.21%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you will do the homework and and fair tests.

Best fit · Effort For RewardAmazing lecturesLots of homeworkExtra credit lifelineExams match reviewsCaring and responsive
  • and example-heavy; most students say concepts finally click.
  • Workload is heavy (worksheets, MyMathLab, reviews) but .
  • A is very achievable if and use .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A is realistic if you complete heavy practice work and because , but it is not free.

Almost all ; online sample is too small to shift the picture.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Content is standard college math difficulty; , but pacing and volume still challenge weaker math students.

In-person reviews dominate; online comments split between manageable and frustrating.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and tags warn that skipping class hurts your chance to pass.

Both online and as required when mentioned.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Roughly 84% would take again and most detailed comments urge students not to hesitate if they will put in the work.

Recommendation is strongly positive in person; online has one strong no among only two reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

is frequent and many students report fair recovery chances if they communicate and complete practice work.

Format shift

Leniency evidence is mostly in-person; one online review still noted lots of .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students consistently report many , and long review packets each week.

Format shift

Heavy workload appears in .

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Majority praise organized notes, many board examples, patience with questions, and late-night help; a minority cite accent or rushing.

Format shift

In-person praise is deep and consistent; online quality is mixed on a tiny sample.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Homework builds skill, but and everything else is secondary practice.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

48 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and exam-aligned; heavy homework and mandatory attendance are the main tradeoffs.

Main concern

Lots of weekly work and .

What students said

“The goat. .”
MATH10
“Especially the review assignments, they covers almost 90% of the exams.”
MATH124
“Do all your worksheets and you will get A.”
MATH2

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

one student found him supportive and reliable with heavy notes; another found theory-heavy teaching and .

Main concern

Online delivery can feel lecture-heavy with limited practical payoff for some students.

What students said

“ and he is reliable to help you.”
MATH124
“You . They are just waste of time.”
2A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, so preparation is transparent if you drill the materials.

Practice-exam alignedReview covers most questionsExtra credit on examsMultiple regular exams plus cumulative final

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as nearly identical to reviews or sample tests when students prepare thoroughly.

From practice exam90% from reviewWorksheets match tests
“He's exam is really easy in 124. It .”
MATH124
“Usually, the test was about 90-95% identical to the sample test.”
MATH2

Online

Online comments emphasize heavy testing if you do not study notes, but .

Test heavy if unpreparedNote-heavy preparation
“It is only tested heavily if you don't study or understand the material.”
MATH124

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The goat. . Really chill and and thoroughly, and makes lectures engaging with humor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (2 online, 48 in , and heavy practice work. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“Makes math make sense!”

📝

78/100

“ gives except 1-2 problems which will come from the notes.”

📚 Heavy But Useful Work

28/100

“His class has a lot of work though, there are ”

❤️ Student Support

88/100

“He is willing to postpone the deadline and even answer your questions at 1 am.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and thoroughly
  • does example after example on the board
  • He doesn't move on until people understand

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Getting an A is definitely feasible
  • if you want an A, IT IS very POSSIBLE but you will have to work for it

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • Lots of homework
  • Hw assignments range from 20-80 problems
  • review assignments cover almost 90% of the exams

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

76

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews across many years and courses with detailed, mostly consistent themes on teaching, workload, and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 550
4 out of 515
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 57

Course coverage

MATH12419 reviews
MATH216 reviews
MATH3A5 reviews
MATH2A4 reviews
2A3 reviews
Show 3 more courses
MATH101 review
MATH211 review
MATH3B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

44 reported outcomes

A range

32

A+ 2 · A 27 · A- 3

B range

9

B+ 3 · B 6

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2