AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

James Granitto

PHIL3LOGIC · PHIL1 · PHILOSOPHY3 · LOGIC3 · LOGICPHIL3 · PHIL3 · LOG · PHILOLOGI · PHILOSOPHY · PHIL115 · LOGIC · 54 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if you want a funny, sharp philosophy or logic teacher and are willing to work for the grade.

Best fit · Effort For RewardSarcastic entertainerClear lecturesTough on quizzesNo study guidesLecture-based tests
  • , and full of sarcasm that keeps students awake.
  • Grades lean hard on quizzes and essays; .
  • Show up and and the content is manageable; skip class and you will struggle.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

An A is possible if you attend and write carefully, but quizzes and .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Logic and philosophy concepts are approachable with but .

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

but skipping lectures hurts tests that track what he says in class.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Most students recommend him for .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Often tagged a and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

62/100

Workload is mostly lectures plus quizzes or .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

, and one of the best philosophy teachers.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

, and tests drawn heavily from lecture.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students praise his humor and clarity but and and study guides are rare.

Main concern

and course feel harder than the lectures.

What students said

“His classes are a fair amount of lecture, and his class grade .”
LOGIC
“He's a funny guy, don't get me wrong, but he refuses to make study guides for .”
PHIL115
“ .”
PHIL3

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and and can be picky, with few study guides provided.

Lecture-based examsEssay examsTricky T/F questionsQuiz heavyNo study guides

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

on lecture, sometimes with tricky true-false items and no study guides.

Essay examsQuiz heavyLecture-based testsNo study guides
“For the C's or D's.”
LOGIC
“Tricky questions on the T/F sections, but as far as teaching, he is a great teacher.”
PHIL3LOGIC
“ in class.”
PHIL1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you want an easy A go to another class. If you want to learn and have some fun doing it and don't mind working hard then I definitly reccomend his classes.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 in-person reviews, highlighting teaching, humor, and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“Granitto is indcredible. He has .”

😂 Humor & Energy

90/100

“Jim is a great, very funny and sarcastic humor.”

⚖️

48/100

“The lectures are engaging, but you have to be very diligent and very writing-capable to get an A.”

👍 Recommendation

78/100

“Dreading this class and he made it awesome! Do not take Logic with any other teacher, only with Granitto.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He makes it so interesting, and I am actuallying taking another class with him
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you want an easy A go to another class
  • The
  • he .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • I love the sarcasm!
  • very helpful and
  • he's SUPER sarcastic.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

54

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty in-person reviews spanning many years with consistent praise for lectures and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 543
4 out of 56
3 out of 53
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PHIL319 reviews
LOGIC12 reviews
PHIL19 reviews
PHIL1152 reviews
PHIL3LOGIC2 reviews
Show 6 more courses
LOG1 review
LOGIC31 review
LOGICPHIL31 review
PHILOLOGI1 review
PHILOSOPHY1 review
PHILOSOPHY31 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

5

B+ 3 · B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Audit/No_Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1