AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Theresa Mclntire

CHEM1B · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Evidence is too thin and ; only enroll if you can self-teach Chem1B and verify current teaching style.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizing LecturesClear Criteria TagsSelf-Study HeavyChem1B OnlySplit Formats
  • Only two reviews exist and they completely disagree on teaching quality.
  • The online student calls lectures good and .
  • The , and dropped the course.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

40/100

Even the positive review says the class takes effort, and the negative review withdrew after finding the course very hard.

Online review implies fair but effortful A; .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Difficulty ratings and comments frame Chem1B as demanding with heavy lecture and .

In-person rates difficulty 5 and online rates 3, both still treat chemistry as serious work.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

as mandatory.

Online and evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

one strong yes online and .

Online evidence recommends; in-person evidence strongly discourages.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

The ; the negative review does not detail grade harshness beyond overall failure of the experience.

Format shift

Online says fair grading; deductions.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Both accounts imply substantial chemistry effort and lecture load typical of Chem1B.

Format shift

Online explicitly says it takes effort; in-person required learning mostly alone.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

One review praises amazing lectures; the other describes nervous, confusing delivery that made students feel dumb.

Format shift

Online teaching praised; in-person teaching criticized as confusing and unhelpful.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

70/100

Reviews do not detail assignment weights, but lecture-heavy Chem1B .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One in-person Chem1B student found lectures nervous and confusing and felt dismissed when asking for help, then withdrew.

Main concern

and unhelpful clarification experiences.

What students said

“She was always talking over her own words she seemed very nervous and often made mistakes.”
Chem1B

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

One online Chem1B student strongly recommends her for good lectures and .

Main concern

Single-review sample cannot confirm consistency.

What students said

“ . Very good lectures. . The class takes effort though.”
Chem1B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, or open-book policy; .

No clear proctoring detailsLecture heavyFair grading claim online

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

proctoring; complaints focus on lecture clarity.

Lecture heavy
“Expects you to basically know chemistry had to learn on my own”
Chem1B

Online

Online review praises fair grading and lectures but .

Fair grading claim
“Very good lectures. . The class takes effort though.”
Chem1B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Very good lectures. . The class takes effort though.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews only (1 online, 1 in person), underscoring conflicting experiences. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“She was always talking over her own words she seemed very nervous and often made mistakes.”

👍 Recommendation Split

50/100

“ . Very good lectures.”

📚

35/100

“Expects you to basically know chemistry had to learn on my own”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very good lectures
  • she seemed very nervous and often made mistakes
  • made you seem dumb when coming to ask for clarification

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The class takes effort though
  • had to learn on my own

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Only two reviews with opposite conclusions and limited assessment detail make confidence low.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

Chem1B2 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1