AI Rate Professor

Writing

Sherry Williams

WR302 · WR1 · ENG000 · WR399 · WR2 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Avoid unless you have no alternative; recent students and harsh demeanor.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderCondescendingHeavy BusyworkPolarizingAvoid Recent Sections
  • Recent WR1 and related reviews describe rude, condescending behavior and .
  • Heavy paper and and little help.
  • Older WR399 reviews are much more positive, so experience may vary by course and year.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Many report tough unfair grading and Fs, though a few got A+ when showing up and .

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

, and frustrating busywork make the content and process hard for most.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Several reviews mark attendance mandatory; but still important.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Would-take-again is about 25% and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

on quizzes, and multiple F grades dominate recent reviews.

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

15/100

Lots of homework, so , and pop quizzes pile on frustrating busywork.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Recent students call her rude, condescending, and unclear; older WR399 reviews praise feedback and help.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Papers, reading, and ; .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

recent courses report hostile teaching and busywork, while older WR399 students found her caring and beginner-friendly.

Main concern

, and massive attrition in some sections.

What students said

“ !!!”
WR1
“She also grades insanely unfairly.”
WR1
“I definitely suggest her to people who are uncomfortable with writing.”
WR399

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews cite random pop quizzes with no partial credit and .

Pop quizzesNo partial creditHard paper grading

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Pop quizzes and make assessment feel strict.

Pop quizzesNo partial creditTough paper grading
“ and never give partial credit.”
WR1
“ and has no office hours and refuses to help you out.”
WR1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 in-person reviews, , and polarized older vs recent experiences. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚠️ Teaching Disaster Risk

30/100

“She is a really really bad professor. The beginning of the semester was completely full and by halfway through, less than 10 of us were left.”

⚖️

18/100

“She also grades insanely unfairly.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

25/100

“ !”

Theme 1

😠 About Character & Tone

  • infuriatingly condescending towards students who ask for clarity/help
  • If anyone disagrees with her she will start shouting.
  • Has a pompous attitude and is very condescending.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you don't write what she wants to hear, you'll get an F

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • piled with loads of frustrating, complicated busy work
  • Lots of homework, So many papers
  • Get ready to read

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Eight detailed reviews from 2017-2022 with strong consistency in recent negative themes, though older positives reduce overall agreement.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 54

Course coverage

WR13 reviews
WR3992 reviews
ENG0001 review
WR21 review
WR3021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

2

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 1