AI Rate Professor

Health Sciences PE amp Athletics

Jovan Stojanovski

KNES95 · KNES25 · KNES3A · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Take him for general PE or adapted online classes if you want low stress, but if you want real skill coaching.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyInconsistent PE instructionCaring when adapted onlineEasy quizzes with notesWeak tennis coachingAttendance required for some sections
  • Non-tennis PE sections can be easy and .
  • Tennis (KNES25) reviews split hard: some call it fun if skilled, others say untrained and neglectful.
  • Online KNES95 praised him as caring and adaptive during remote shift.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Multiple students report A or A+ with light effort and note-allowed quizzes, though one tennis student ended Incomplete.

yet; easy-A evidence is mostly from in-person PE.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

PE content is generally light and low intellectual load, though tennis skill-building is poorly taught.

Both formats describe low content difficulty; tennis complaints are about instruction, not concepts.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Some sections require login or while as not mandatory.

; online and one PE section report flexible or none.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

praised for care and easy PE, strongly avoided for tennis coaching quality.

Online and ; both tennis in-person reviews say no.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Students report A and A+ with note quizzes and ; grades appear forgiving in non-tennis PE.

Format shift

Online grade was pending; lenient outcomes cluster in in-person KNES3A.

Workload

Light

75/100

No textbooks, light PE activities, and .

Format shift

Both formats describe light work; tennis frustration is about coaching, not volume.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Caring and adaptive in some courses, but tennis students call him unprepared, disengaged, and unqualified.

Format shift

Online adaptation was praised; .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Assessment centers on participation, login requirements, and .

Format shift

Quiz notes mentioned in person; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

one easy interesting class with to unqualified neglect.

Main concern

Tennis instruction quality is heavily criticized as unskilled and disengaged.

What students said

“Great guy. Made PE very interesting and easy. You are even allowed to use your notes for the online quizzes.”
KNES3A
“If you're looking for a fun or . He is not qualified to teach tennis.”
KNES25
“If you are looking for . But if you really wanna learn to play tennis you are not gonna learn.”
KNES25

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Single online review paints him as approachable, patient, and adaptive when forced to teach hands-on content remotely.

Main concern

Class was meant for in-person demos, so online format limited skill demonstration.

What students said

“He really wants you to succeed. , and is patient and willing to answer any and all questions.”
KNES95

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Quizzes allow notes and act as light checkpoints; no evidence of harsh proctored finals.

Note-allowed quizzesOnline quizzesParticipation login requirement

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and stresses login hours as a pass requirement.

Note-allowed quizzesLogin hours to pass
“You are even allowed to use your notes for the online quizzes. Make sure you log in for 24 hours as it is a requirement to pass the class.”
KNES3A

Online

Online review does not clearly describe exam proctoring or format beyond adapted lectures.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and you'll pass.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews spanning online and split sample.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“Really bad, sorry but he's too old to teach tennis, he can't even play and is not even responsible for class.”

👍 Recommendation Split

50/100

“He really wants you to succeed. , and is patient.”

📈 Easy PE Path

78/100

“Made PE very interesting and easy. and you'll pass.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He breaks it down well and adapted well to the circumstances
  • He is willing to answer any questions you have for him
  • He rides bike around campus during the class and leave everyone with every level to play with machine

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You are even allowed to use your notes for the online quizzes
  • Good class if you already know how to play tennis
  • If you really wanna learn to play tennis you are not gonna learn

Theme 3

❤️ About Care & Access

  • Great guy
  • He is not qualified to teach tennis

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only four reviews across 2018-2021 with sharply split opinions and limited grade detail reduce reliability.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

KNES252 reviews
KNES3A1 review
KNES951 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1