AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Susan Zimmer

MATH2 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
20/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

Avoid unless you must take MATH2 and and a hostile classroom.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderTest heavyPop quizzesUnclear lecturesRude and unhelpful
  • and
  • Older neutral satisfactory note does not balance the severe warning

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

10/100

, and fail-happy comments make an A extremely unlikely.

.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

18/100

Lectures hard to keep up with, test heavy, and high difficulty ratings.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

; the other does not contradict flexibility.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Explicit AVOID HER and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

and claim she is happiest failing students, with an F reported.

Format shift

In-person evidence only.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Test heavy and .

Format shift

In-person evidence only.

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

; one old satisfactory blurb is thin.

Format shift

In-person evidence only.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Test heavy and beware of pop quizzes define assessment.

Format shift

In-person evidence only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person MATH2 is described as and ; one old review only says satisfactory.

Main concern

, and .

What students said

“Nothing makes her happier than failing students. ”
MATH2
“She was satsifactory.”
MATH2

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

In-person MATH2 is test heavy with pop quizzes and ; proctoring tools not specified.

Test heavyPop quizzesTough grader

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Test-heavy in-person MATH2 with pop quizzes and ; Lockdown or webcam not mentioned.

Test heavyBeware of pop quizzesTough grader
“ ”
MATH2
“grades like a maniac and gets outraged if you ask her questions at all”
MATH2

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Nothing makes her happier than failing students. ”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

😠 Classroom Climate

15/100

“She also yells at students a lot and makes them feel guilty in front of everyone.”

📝

28/100

“ ”

🚫 Recommendation

12/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • incredibly rude and unhelpful
  • lectures are super hard to keep up with
  • She was satsifactory.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • grades like a maniac
  • Nothing makes her happier than failing students

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Two reviews far apart in time; one is vivid and negative, one is a brief 2010 satisfactory note.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH22 reviews

Reported outcomes

F results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values