AI Rate Professor

Digital Arts

William Atkins

DMA55 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
1.0

The decision

Great for an easy A+ if ; weak if you need strong software instruction.

Best fit · Easy A HunterGentle gradingEasy A+Old-fashionedWeak software skillsMixed reviews
  • Every reported grade is A+ with very low difficulty.
  • and weak InDesign/Photoshop knowledge.
  • One recent review strongly defends him as caring and helpful.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

95/100

All four reviews report A+ with difficulty 1 and .

All evidence is from In person reviews.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

88/100

Content difficulty rated 1 across reviews; projects exist but grades come easily.

All evidence is from In person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

; others say yes—policy is inconsistent.

All evidence is from In person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Would-take-again data is thin; one loves him while .

All evidence is from In person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

92/100

Graded by few things, very gently, with universal A+ outcomes.

Format shift

All evidence is from In person reviews.

Workload

Light

80/100

Pre-project work and projects exist but difficulty stays at 1 with easy grades.

Format shift

All evidence is from In person reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

42/100

caring and and critiques for others.

Format shift

All evidence is from In person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Projects, pre-project work, and few graded items dominate over exams.

Format shift

All evidence is from In person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person DMA55: easy A+ and , but skill teaching and critiques are often criticized.

Main concern

Limited program knowledge and unhelpful critiques for beginners.

What students said

“Prof. and helpful and grades very gently.”
DMA55
“If you ask questions on how to do something he will not answer because he doesn't know how.”
DMA55
“textbook was a waste of money i didn't open it and got an A”
DMA55

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize projects and .

Project-basedFew graded items

Assessment risk

Varies

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Assessment centers on projects and critiques; exams are not clearly described.

Project-basedFew graded items
“he gave pretty good assignments and .”
DMA55

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I honestly don't understand why this guy has such poor reviews. Prof. and helpful and grades very gently.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting easy A+ grades and mixed teaching skill. Credibility rating: Medium.

🅰️ Easy Grades

95/100

“grades very gently”

🛠️ Software Gaps

35/100

“If you ask questions on how to do something he will not answer because he doesn't know how.”

📚 Textbook Waste

70/100

“textbook was a waste of money i didn't open it and got an A”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • grades very gently
  • Graded by few things
  • got an A

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • old-fashioned and stiff
  • doesn't seem to gully know his way around indesign
  • He's a JOKE!

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • really nice and helpful
  • Wants everyone to succeed
  • he has great humor

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

but split opinions on teaching quality across years.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

DMA554 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 4

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values