AI Rate Professor

Writing

Lyndsey Lefebvre

WR1WR2 · ENGLISH1OO · WR2 · WR1 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
72.73%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Take Lefebvre if you want a fun writing teacher and ; if your schedule is already full.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHilarious writing profPaper-heavy loadClear rubricsFood-themed topicsMixed workload pain
  • , and food-based writing themes.
  • Workload can spike hard with long research papers and summer compression.
  • Grades are often strong if you follow rubrics and turn work in on time.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

Many students report high grades when they follow rubrics and submit on .

Online reviews lean easy A; but with heavier page counts.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Writing skills themselves are teachable and fun, but .

Online difficulty varies by term design; .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

, though participation, conferences, or stamps still matter in some terms.

Online uses Discord or office hours for participation; .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

73/100

Most students recommend her for humor and feedback, while a .

Online is more split; in-person leans positive if students can handle the writing volume.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

Clear rubrics and some complaints of immature or slow feedback.

Format shift

; in-person more often says easy if you follow the rubric.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Multiple papers, annotated bibliographies, and occasional 20-30 page research projects make the load heavy.

Format shift

Some online terms feel light; in-person and summer sections are repeatedly called paper-heavy.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Students praise humor, engagement, and and slow replies.

Format shift

Teaching praise is stronger in person; online quality is more mixed.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

, and writing projects rather than exams.

Format shift

and in-person WR courses.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students praise humor and transferable writing skills while and intense 8-week loads.

Main concern

and dense summer pacing can overwhelm full-time students.

What students said

“She grades VERY easily if you follow her rubrics exactly.”
WR2
“25 page paper plus 25 pages of annotations and bibliography.”
WR2
“she is absolutely hilarious.”
WR1

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online WR2 is split: some call it an easy A with few assignments, others , and a huge final paper.

Main concern

Participation systems and .

What students said

“This is an easy A class and all you need to do is to be ON TIME”
WR2
“ . no zooms. wants you to succeed.”
WR2
“ and 20+ pg paper at the end.”
WR2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The course is paper-driven rather than traditional proctored exams, so but writing volume is high.

Paper-based assessmentLong research essaysRubric gradingFew or no traditional exams

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person assessment is long papers and ; reviews do not describe closed-book exams.

Long research papersAnnotated bibliographyRubric-based grading
“We had a 17 page paper and I got an 100% by turning it in.”
WR2
“25 page paper plus 25 pages of annotations and bibliography.”
WR2
“She grades VERY easily if you follow her rubrics exactly.”
WR2

Online

Online reviews center on papers, Discord participation, and few live sessions; .

Paper submissionsDiscord participationFew Zoom meetings
“no zooms. wants you to succeed.”
WR2
“20+ pg paper at the end.”
WR2

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Lefebrve made it one of the easier, most hilarious, and interesting classes. She grades VERY easily if you follow her rubrics exactly.”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews (3 online, 13 in-person), highlighting humor, paper volume, and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“Professor L managed to teach me more in an eight week Summer course than I have learned in years.”

📄 Workload Reality

32/100

“the workload is absolutely AWFUL.”

🅰️ Easy If On Time

76/100

“This is an easy A class and all you need to do is to be ON TIME”

😂 Humor Factor

85/100

“she is absolutely hilarious.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's sarcastic but .
  • She teaches you not only writing skills, but life skills.
  • She used food as a .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • the work is EASY! And it boosts your grade!
  • Its very tough. She makes class fun but it's still a ton of work.
  • .

Theme 3

📝

  • So many papers
  • 25-30 pg research essay with a 30 pg annotated bibliography
  • and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Sixteen reviews spanning 2014-2021 with repeated paper-load and humor themes give strong, consistent evidence.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 53
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

WR211 reviews
WR13 reviews
ENGLISH1OO1 review
WR1WR21 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 2 · A 7

B range

4

B+ 2 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values