AI Rate Professor

English As A Second Language

Maria Knygnytska-Johnson

ESL301 · ESL501 · AESL504 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

unless you can teach yourself ESL writing and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProNo real lecturesUnclear gradingLazy feedbackDisrespectfulMandatory attendance
  • Most students but gives little or .
  • Lectures are while she does other work.
  • and harsh, with one reported F and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

hard even when content is not advanced.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Content itself is often basic ESL work, but poor teaching and requires.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Multiple students report and skipping hurts or blocks passing.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Four of five reviews strongly because of laziness, , and bad feedback.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Tagged as a , and at least one F.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students repeatedly mention many papers and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

Dominant theme is , and unhelpful or disrespectful classroom behavior.

Format shift

One older positive review praises clarity, but most reviews are strongly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment centers on frequent essays and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

as lecture-free, paper-heavy, and poorly supported, with rare praise for clarity in one higher-level course.

Main concern

No teaching, delayed or , and .

What students said

“She is very disrespectful and not helpful. She is very negative and does not have office hours or .”
ESL501
“Escape from this horrible professor! There was no lacture during whole semester.”
ESL301
“We wrote a lot of essay but we never have a .”
ESL301

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on essays and , so exam friendliness is hard to pin down.

Essay heavyUnclear gradingLittle feedback

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and unclear grade posting.

Essay heavyUnclear gradingDelayed feedback
“she gave back our essay . and she never posted grade.”
ESL301
“She will not help you learn from your mistakes on the papers.”
ESL501

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Escape from this horrible professor! There was no lacture during whole semester.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews spanning 2016-2021, highlighting teaching, feedback, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

☠️ Teaching Quality

20/100

“She is so boring and useless! she never teaches us anything, she always let us discuss with the classmates then her job is done.”

🚫 Recommendation

18/100

“ . !”

📝 Workload and Feedback

28/100

“We wrote a lot of essay but we never have a .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she never teaches us anything
  • , no following syllabus
  • There was no lacture during whole semester

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • The second time taking her class, and I still didn't pass

Theme 3

😠 About Support and Respect

  • She is very disrespectful and not helpful
  • does not have office hours or
  • She is lazy so she could not keep her plan(syllabus).

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Five detailed in-person reviews spanning 2016-2021 are consistent in negativity, but the sample is small and mostly older.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ESL3013 reviews
AESL5041 review
ESL5011 review

Reported outcomes

F results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values