AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Adrienne Williams

CHEM50 · LCHS2020 · CHEMISTRY1B · CHEM12A · LCH2020 · CHEMISTRY12A · CHEM1B · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
35.71%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Avoid unless ; lectures rarely carry the class.

Best fit · Self Taught ProReads Off SlidesSelf-Taught CourseTest HeavyRushed LecturesPolarized Chemistry
  • Many students and you must teach yourself chemistry.
  • ; outcomes range from A with all-nighters to F/Incomplete.
  • A minority praise her as caring and excellent, but the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Some students earn As only through all-nighters and self-study; others report B/C/F with .

Online includes both A via grind and F/Incomplete; in-person also mixed but often hard.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

, and students say the material must be learned from the book.

Both formats report speed and self-teaching; online CHEM50 still felt hard.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

58/100

; in-person comments mix mandatory and optional with early dismissals.

; in-person is less consistent.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

and most detailed comments warn students to choose someone else.

Online and of strong praise in person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

Tags often say tough grader and graded by few things; but .

Format shift

Online CHEM50 got flexible deadlines once; in-person more often called tough.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Homework is not always heavy, but , and .

Format shift

Online mentions labs and extensions; .

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

, and low classroom value despite occasional caring praise.

Format shift

Online and ; a few in-person outliers disagree.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Students repeatedly describe test-heavy grading with few other score components.

Format shift

Online notes multiple-choice tests and labs; and graded-by-few-things.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person chem sections are mostly criticized for speed, useless lectures, and .

Main concern

, and students feeling forced to self-study.

What students said

“All she does .”
CHEM1B
“This is by far the worst professor I've had in 3 years.”
CHEM12A
“ .”
CHEMISTRY12A

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online CHEM50/LCHS reviews mix one flexible caring A experience with harsh unprofessional complaints.

Main concern

Weak lecture structure and very negative LCHS experiences.

What students said

“Her lectures lack a little bit of structure so make sure youre dedicated to learning on your own in order to succeed.”
CHEM50
“I got an A only because I had to do all-nighters so hard work > professors regardless.”
CHEM50
“Dr. A was the most unprofessional professor I have ever experienced.”
LCHS2020

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; reviews do not clearly prove open-book or special proctoring rules.

Test HeavyMultiple Choice OnlineStudy GuidesSelf-Taught Prep

Assessment risk

Standard

44/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person courses are described as test heavy with study guides and .

Test HeavyStudy GuidesGraded By Few Things
“She , but you definitely have to teach yourself!”
CHEM1B
“ ”
LCH2020

Online

Online CHEM50 mentions multiple-choice tests and labs; LCHS comments are negative but .

Multiple Choice TestsLabsExtensions
“Multiple choice tests, 10 labs, gave a lot of extensions. No E.C.”
CHEM50
“ .”
LCHS2020

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you want to have a good foundation/understanding of chemistry, you may want to reconsider taking her.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews across online and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“Her lectures are completely useless because she's completely wrong on so many issues.”

📚

30/100

“a lot of material has to be self taught.”

🧪

44/100

“She , but you definitely have to teach yourself!”

👎 Recommendation

32/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Reads off the .
  • Goes at the speed of light and .
  • She speed reads the lecture, doesn't care if students don't understand something

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I got an A only because I had to do all-nighters
  • She

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • .
  • she is a good person, just not a good teacher what-so-ever.
  • The abundant amount negativity that surrounds her is unreal.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

14 reviews with both formats and strong negative consistency, though a few highly positive outliers remain.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 57

Course coverage

CHEM1B3 reviews
LCHS20203 reviews
CHEM12A2 reviews
CHEM502 reviews
CHEMISTRY12A2 reviews
Show 2 more courses
CHEMISTRY1B1 review
LCH20201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 5

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 1 · B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Incomplete 1