AI Rate Professor

English

Niloo Sarabi

WR1 · WRITING1 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
44/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

; if you need a fair grade and respectful tone.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough Grader OnlineFormat Split PersonalityRude on ZoomKind In PersonStrong Writing Feedback
  • Online students report rude Zoom behavior, camera rules, and near-impossible high grades.
  • , and real writing growth.
  • Experience depends almost entirely on whether the section is online or face-to-face.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Online reviewers say an A is nearly impossible and papers average around C-, while .

Online evidence shows harsh grading; work.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Writing load and lecture pace feel standard, not beginner fluff and not extreme theory.

Both formats describe a normal first-year writing course; difficulty .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

as mandatory and and audio on.

Online reviews stress camera-on Zoom rules; as mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Half of because in-person teaching is warm and useful, while online reviews strongly warn others away.

; both online reviews .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

and hard paper averages dominate online, with only limited leniency noted in person.

Format shift

; in-person comments are milder and more positive.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Workload centers on papers and lectures rather than constant busywork, but last-minute online posts add stress.

Format shift

Online students report ; in-person students note fewer graded items.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

and skill-building, but online delivery is described as rude and unclear.

Format shift

Online reviews rate teaching as awful; .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

and participation rather than high-stakes exams.

Format shift

Both formats center writing assignments; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students call her kind, passionate, and .

Main concern

Still expects on-time work and attention in class.

What students said

“I feel like my writing abilities really improved in her class and she is a .”
WRITING1
“If you pay attention in class and turn in class.”
WR1

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections are described as , and humiliating on Zoom, with and forced camera use.

Main concern

, and grades stuck near C-level averages.

What students said

“Professor Niloo is super rude especially when you ask her questions. She makes you feel dumb and embarrass you in zoom meetings.”
WRITING1
“ and the average of -!”
WR1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and participation more than formal exam rules.

Paper-heavy gradingParticipation matters

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and timely assignments more than exam policy.

Writing assignmentsGood feedback
“If you pay attention in class and turn in class.”
WR1

Online

and camera participation rather than proctored tests.

Camera required on ZoomHarsh paper grading
“If youre not comfortable having cameras on and audios on the whole meeting dont take this class. .”
WRITING1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Niloo is super rude especially when you ask her questions. She makes you feel dumb and embarrass you in zoom meetings.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews (2 online, 2 in person), highlighting the sharp format split in tone and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎭 Format Personality Split

55/100

“Professor Sarabi is a pretty solid professor. I feel like my writing abilities really improved in her class and she is a .”

📉 Online Grade Wall

32/100

“Its impossible to have B or A in this class she grades way too hard.”

✍️ Writing Growth In Person

80/100

“The techniques she conveyed in class is very helpful in helping me to develop critical writing skills.”

Theme 1

🖥️ About Online Delivery

  • She makes you feel dumb and embarrass you in zoom meetings.
  • Sometimes she would post homework the same day it was due without warning.
  • Absolutely horrid and very rude as well!!

Theme 2

🏫

  • She is a .
  • She really tries to connect with her students and that made her class fun.
  • passionate about how to have her students write confidently and successfully

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Only four detailed 2019-2020 reviews exist, but they split cleanly by format and stay internally consistent.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

WR12 reviews
WRITING12 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values