AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Mitchell Khong

MATH124 · MATH62710 · MATH3B · MATH105 · MATH11 · STATS · MATH10 · MATH3A · MATH3A3B · 37 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Avoid unless you are already strong in math and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerConfusing lecturesTeach yourself from the bookTough graderHigh drop rateTest heavy math
  • Most students say , so they learn from the textbook alone.
  • Exams and , failures, and large enrollment drops.
  • A minority praise humor, partial credit when work is shown, and inspiration, but overall recommendation is low.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Many report Ds, Fs, and first-time failures despite heavy studying; only strong self-teachers occasionally succeed.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Course content is already hard, and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

, but many say lectures add little value while still warning that skipping can hurt.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Would-take-again is about 25% and most recent .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Students report , and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Lots of , and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

27/100

Dominant theme is that he knows math but , so students teach themselves.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Weekly quizzes and ; homework exists but .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

37 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person math classes are widely described as confusing and and many students dropping or failing.

Main concern

and taught.

What students said

“I STRONGLY ADVISE THAT !!”
MATH3A
“Prepare to teach yourself, first exam average was 50%”
MATH11
“his teaching method is just too advanced for the classes he teaches”
MATH3B

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are hard, often closed-book, and frequently mismatched with lectures, making them high risk.

Closed-book examsTest heavyWeekly quizzesLittle partial creditNo curve

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as hard, closed-book, and poorly aligned with .

Closed-bookTest heavyWeekly quizzesHarsh grading
“ , and ”
MATH11
“He would have us study one way and ”
MATH3A
“if you miss one thing on a problem hell count the whole thing wrong”
MATH3B

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I STRONGLY ADVISE THAT !!”

Voice snapshots generated from 37 in-person reviews, , and low recommendation. Credibility rating: High.

🚨 Teaching Clarity

27/100

“this professor has no idea what he's doing. and himself”

📚

28/100

“I spent the semester learning from the book because ”

👎

25/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he basically read the textbook during lectures
  • Horrible teaching style... bounces back and forth all over the place
  • You teach yourself

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • first exam average was 50% and second exam average was 62%
  • I've never failed a class before until taking this class
  • if you miss one thing on a problem hell count the whole thing wrong

Theme 3

🔀 Minority Positive Notes

  • so always show work
  • Good teacher and funny guy
  • Khong encourages his students to think for themselves

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

37

Recent reviews read by the AI

37

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-seven in-person reviews over , and high drop rates.

Inside 37 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 50
3 out of 53
2 out of 58
1 out of 517

Course coverage

MATH119 reviews
MATH3A7 reviews
MATH3B6 reviews
MATH1245 reviews
MATH103 reviews
Show 4 more courses
MATH3A3B3 reviews
MATH1052 reviews
MATH627101 review
STATS1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

21 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 1 · A- 1

B range

3

B 3

C range

1

C 1

D range

5

D+ 4 · D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

8

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Fail 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 1 · Rather not say 2 · Rather_Not_Say 1