AI Rate Professor

Writing

Katie Roberts

WR2 · WR1 · WR399 · WR65215 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
37.5%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you already write well and can self-manage; many students actively warn others away.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnorganizedTough graderYouTube lecturesMixed feedback qualitySlow email response
  • Online and , and lectures pulled from YouTube.
  • Positive reviews praise energy, caring tone, and .
  • , so effort does not always feel rewarded.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Strict rubrics and , and several students still left frustrated or withdrew.

Online reviews stress unresponsiveness; in-person reviews stress rubrics and heavy papers.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Content is standard composition with lots of reading and , but organization issues raise the real difficulty.

; online adds follow-up problems.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

, while others tag skip class and you will not pass, so policy is inconsistent across reviews.

; several in-person reviews treat attendance as required.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

36/100

Would-take-again sits near 38 percent, with multiple blunt do-not-take warnings outweighing the strong minority praise.

Online reviews are uniformly negative; and WorthIt.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Tough grader tags dominate, and students say .

Format shift

Both online and .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Lots of , and continuous reading appear across negative and positive comments.

Format shift

In-person and online alike flag many papers; online also notes abandoned assignments.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Energy and , but unorganization, YouTube lectures, and .

Format shift

Online teaching quality looks worse; .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Essays and paper volume drive the course more than .

Format shift

Evidence is consistent across formats on papers as the main work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

some love her energy and papers and little guidance.

Main concern

Strict rubrics plus uneven organization can make hard work feel poorly supported.

What students said

“ ! I emailed her couple of times during weekdays, but she never answered me.”
WR1
“The feedback I recieved on the I've ever recieved on an essay in my life time.”
WR399
“If you want to become a good writer, this is the class for you. Expect to work hard”
WR1

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Both online reviews are strongly negative about response time, organization, and reliance on YouTube content.

Main concern

Slow or incomplete answers to questions and .

What students said

“Any time you have questions or need to , and usually doesn't even answer your question or concern.”
WR2
“She gets all of her lectures from YouTube videos. and .”
WR1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize essays and rubrics far more than proctored exams, so .

Essay-focused assessmentStrict rubricsLimited exam detail

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and ; reviews do not clearly describe closed-book proctored finals.

Essay rubricsHomework and papers
“The and if you didn't follow the guidelines it impacted your grade a lot.”
WR1

Online

Online comments focus on papers and organization, not webcam or proctoring rules.

So many papersClear grading criteria
“You would start an .”
WR1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews (2 online, 6 in person), balancing harsh organization critiques with . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“She is Super unorganized and never follows up on assignments. Overall shes .”

📧 Responsiveness Issues

25/100

“Any time you have questions or need to , and usually doesn't even answer your question or concern.”

📝

70/100

“The feedback I recieved on the I've ever recieved on an essay in my life time.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

36/100

“Whatever you do, do not take Katie Roberts class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • most of her lectures came from YouTube videos.
  • The energy she brought to the classroom was great.
  • set the tone right away.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Lots of homework, So
  • you and follow the rubric
  • If and stay on top of

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization

  • !
  • never answered me.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Only eight reviews with a and two online cases limit certainty despite vivid detail.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

WR15 reviews
WR21 review
WR3991 review
WR652151 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1