AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Miriam Castroconde

CALC4A · CALC3 · MATH4A · MATH3B · CAL4A · 3B · MATH24 · MATH2624 · 3A · MATH3A3B · MATH26 · MATH3A · MATH3AH · 244 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
78.57%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you will keep up weekly and use office hours; if you want an easy low-effort A.

Best fit · Effort For RewardWeekly QuizzesOffice Hours EssentialOrganized And CaringPolarizing Math ProfWork For Your A
  • Many students call her the , care, and fair exams tied to quizzes.
  • A vocal minority say she cannot teach, is a , and .
  • attend, do worksheets and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

An A is possible with steady quiz and , but multiple students say easy A hunters should go elsewhere.

All 50 reviews are in person; no online comparison.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

Calculus and DE content plus fast expectations make the material hard unless you already have strong prerequisites.

In-person only; difficulty tags often 3-5 with .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Almost every class has a quiz or worksheet, so skipping effectively tanks your grade.

In-person evidence only; skip-class-you-will-not-pass tags are common.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

Roughly four-fifths would take again and .

Polarization is all within in-person reviews across multiple math courses.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Partial credit and and mid-70 averages keep it from feeling generous.

Format shift

In-person only; fans call her generous while critics call her harsh.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

, and projects create constant load that punishes procrastination.

Format shift

In-person courses consistently report daily or weekly graded work.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Majority praise clear organized lectures and office hours, but a .

Format shift

All evidence in person; quality of experience varies sharply by student.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Weekly quizzes and worksheets feed into several midterms and a .

Format shift

homework.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person calc and DE courses mix strong praise for organization and care with , and teaching clarity.

Main concern

Falling behind is hard to recover from; weekly quizzes and worksheets keep pressure high.

What students said

“PROFESSOR CASTROCONDE IS THE MY LIFE! !”
MATH3A
“ and worksheet might seem like hell, but they really do help you not to procrastinate”
MATH3B
“Useless prof. Purposely doesn't teach all topics, tells you to go learn it yourself.”
MATH4A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are generally fair and aligned to quizzes and worksheets if .

Weekly QuizzesWorksheets Mirror ExamsFair MidtermsNo Surprise Finals

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and notes; students who review worksheets report fair, sometimes easy exams.

Quiz-Aligned Exams3 Midterms Plus FinalPartial Credit
“go thru each quiz & worksheet thoroughly before the .”
3A
“Her class is not that hard like the rumors say:) The problems in the textbook are even harder than her problems in the exams”
3B
“For test, she called an average of 69 a " because she is trying to keep the average around 70 I guess.”
MATH26

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“PROFESSOR CASTROCONDE IS THE MY LIFE! Trust me, TAKE HER! She helps me a lot during office hours and answers every bit of my questions! and very patient!”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 in-person reviews with no online sample, balancing praise and and teaching. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“Hands down the ”

📋 Workload Reality

34/100

“I have never had to work so hard in a math class before and .”

👍 Recommendation Split

76/100

“If you want an easy A, go elsewhere. Don't mess up with her, she is really respectful and caring to her students.”

⏰

22/100

“ or a worksheet to do”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is SO straightforward unlike so many prof these days which I love.
  • Miriam is a great math prof! She takes time to answer questions
  • She can't/doesn't know how to teach.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you want an A you will have to work for but but its possible.
  • Easy C, Hard A.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • she's like my grandma.
  • she is a really sweet lady who is always willing to help as best as she can.
  • Professor Miriam Helped me through this course

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

244

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

50 detailed in-person reviews over many years with both raves and harsh critiques, strong grade data, and consistent structural themes.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 5118
4 out of 541
3 out of 525
2 out of 528
1 out of 532

Course coverage

MATH3A13 reviews
3A9 reviews
3B5 reviews
MATH265 reviews
MATH3B5 reviews
Show 8 more courses
MATH244 reviews
MATH3A3B2 reviews
MATH4A2 reviews
CAL4A1 review
CALC31 review
CALC4A1 review
MATH26241 review
MATH3AH1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

36 reported outcomes

A range

24

A+ 7 · A 16 · A- 1

B range

5

B+ 2 · B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

7

Not sure yet 5 · Rather not say 2