AI Rate Professor

Information Science

Celina Lee

LIB10 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Only take her online LIB10 if you are comfortable carrying a and peer ratings; individual work is easy, group work is not.

Best fit · Effort For RewardGroup project heavyExtra credit availablePolarized reviewsPeer grading riskFast feedback online
  • Online LIB10 is a 2-unit class with lots of and light individual work for some.
  • Group projects and peer ratings are the main grade killer and source of frustration.
  • Students either finish near 100% or feel tanked by teammates; outcomes split hard.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

and light individual work can push you past 100%, but .

All evidence is from online LIB10 reviews only.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Content is a light 2-unit online class; difficulty mainly comes from group coordination, not concepts.

All evidence is from online LIB10 reviews only.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

as mandatory for the online class.

All evidence is from online LIB10 reviews only.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

and feedback; the other would not because of group work design.

All evidence is from online LIB10 reviews only.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

and lots of help, but peer ratings feel unfair to some.

Format shift

Based only on online reviews.

Workload

Light

70/100

Individual assignments and group work are described as easy if the group communicates.

Format shift

Based only on online reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

; another says group design ruined the class.

Format shift

Based only on online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

and a group project rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

Based only on online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online LIB10 is low-content but ; one student coasted to 102% with , another saw grades crash from peer ratings.

Main concern

Peer-rated group projects can unfairly tank a strong individual grade.

What students said

“I ended the class with a 102% without trying much.”
LIB10
“the professor made everyone rate eachother and I was unfairly rated poorly by the students and .”
LIB10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize assignments and peer-rated group work more than formal exams.

Group projectPeer ratingExtra credit

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Assessment is assignment and ; formal exam format is not clearly described.

Group projectPeer ratingExtra credit
“There's a group project but its really easy, just communicate with your group and you'll get an A.”
LIB10
“There's LOTS of .”
LIB10

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I ended the class with a 102% without trying much.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 online reviews spanning 2017-2020, highlighting care, , and group-project risk. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“She's a really caring professor that responds quickly and .”

👍 Recommendation Split

50/100

“Group work was this professors flaw.”

📈 Easy A Risk

62/100

“There's LOTS of . I ended the class with a 102% without trying much.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's a

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I ended the class with a 102% without trying much
  • and dropped my score significantly
  • I was unfairly rated poorly by the students

Theme 3

⚠️ About Group Work

  • Group work was this professors flaw
  • Individual work should've remained throughout
  • just communicate with your group and you'll get an A

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only two older online reviews with opposite experiences, so confidence in trends is limited.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

LIB102 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values