AI Rate Professor

Speech

Tiffani Smith

WGST350 · COMM1 · COMM2 · COMM9 · COMM · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
26/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid if you can; if you can tolerate a harsh interpersonal style and still deliver structured speeches on her terms.

Best fit · Effort For RewardUnprofessionalHarsh FeedbackInconsistent GradingMandatory AttendancePolarizing
  • Multiple students report rudeness, humiliation, and unprofessional classroom treatment.
  • Grading and syllabus communication are described as .
  • A minority praise real-life skills and personal support for shy speakers.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Some students earn As with effort, but delayed and .

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

Public speaking anxiety and papers raise challenge, but content itself is standard communication coursework.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

as required and skipping is linked to poor outcomes.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

and many reviews warn against her interpersonal and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Students describe tough or .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

, and projects appear regularly without overwhelming volume for every student.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

A few call her excellent and caring, but many report rudeness, humiliation, and weak communication.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

, and group projects share the load rather than pure exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person speech and communication sections are polarizing, with many reports of rudeness and and structure.

Main concern

Unprofessional interactions and .

What students said

“HONESTLY THE .”
COMM1
“She genuinely cares for her students and their future.”
COMM1
“Changed the syllabus about 5-6 times and then got frustrated when we didn't know what was due.”
COMM9

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on speeches, papers, and .

SpeechesPapersGroup Project

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and group work with limited clarity on grading timelines.

SpeechesPapersGroup ProjectDelayed Grades
“no speeches until the 10th week of class.”
COMM1
“There will most likely be a and a .”
COMM2

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“HONESTLY THE . ... EXTREMELY rude! ... Picks on people, humiliates them.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 in-person reviews, highlighting professionalism concerns and polarized support. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“She was so terrible that the chair of the department had to step in twice.”

👎 Recommendation

18/100

“HONESTLY THE .”

⚖️

35/100

“takes her sweet time with assignment until end when she gives a random grade”

❤️ Supportive Minority

70/100

“She genuinely cares for her students and their future.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • EXTREMELY rude
  • Treated us like high school students
  • teaches real life skills
  • shows lots of clips and images

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Changed the syllabus about 5-6 times
  • received a C
  • random grade based on how much she likes you

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She says she cares but she's actually living in a fantasy
  • She truly is amazing
  • Get annoyed at students easily

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

but also strong split opinions, yielding medium credibility.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

COMM16 reviews
COMM1 review
COMM21 review
COMM91 review
WGST3501 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 2 · Not_Sure_Yet 1