Parto Kavoosian

ACCT1B · ACCT1A · 201B · ACCT201A · ACCT201 · ACCT1B65695 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 74/100
RMP rating: 4.2/5
Take again: 80%
Difficulty: 3.6

The decision

if you learn by doing in groups and will put in consistent case and ; skip if you need traditional lecture-first teaching.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHands-On CasesGroup Work HeavyTest HeavyCaringParticipation Matters

Learning is mostly hands-on group cases after short lectures, which many love and some hate.
; .
if you show up and engage.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

As , and solid case prep, but and accounting is hard.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

Accounting content plus frequent cases and .

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

26/100

Participation and cases make presence essential; .

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

, though a clear minority strongly advise against.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

56/100

Exams stay close to taught material for many; EC helps, but random terms and .

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

, and frequent exams add up without being pure overload.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Majority call her caring and clarifying via cases; minority report and poor examples.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Multiple chapter exams and cases drive grades; homework and participation still matter.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and fair exams; a vocal minority say she barely teaches and confuses questions.

Main concern

Hands-off lecture style can leave .

What students said

“If you do well on the case studies, then you will do great on the exam.”
ACCT1B

“very HANDS ON with case studies And she was very involved to help teams work through the problem”
ACCT201

“Does not teach during lecture. You're expected to know the material before showing up to class somehow.”
ACCT201A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Frequent exams track chapter cases for most students; a few report exams mismatch lectures.

Multiple chapter examsCases predict exam contentDrop lowest sometimesFair if you do cases

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and lecture focus; some report surprises and .

6 exams commonCase-linkedDrop lowest sometimes

“ much beyond she teaches!”
ACCT1B

“ .”
ACCT1A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“She is probably one of the few professors I look forward to learn from. !!”
Voice snapshots generated from 18 in-person reviews, balancing hands-on praise with lecture-style criticism. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“Professor Kavoosian is straightforward, caring, and takes the time to make sure her students understand each lesson.”

🧪 Hands-On Method

70/100

“the bulk of the learning is hands on with your group mates”

⚠️ Polarized Lectures

40/100

“Does not teach during lecture. You're expected to know the material before showing up to class somehow.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

keeps it on the need to know parts
walks around to check up on people and help

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

majority of the
, but sometimes has random terms
Do the and and you will do well

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

She wants you to succeed
definitely cares and made things easier
Sweet person

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

18 reviews across 2016-2019 with rich detail; majority positive but consistent negative minority keeps some caution.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511

4 out of 53

3 out of 51

2 out of 51

1 out of 52

Course coverage

ACCT1B8 reviews

ACCT1A6 reviews

201B1 review

ACCT1B656951 review

ACCT2011 review

Show 1 more courses

ACCT201A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

A+ 2 · A 4

B range

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

C 1

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

Audit/No Grade 1 · Not sure yet 1

Parto Kavoosian

x x if you learn by doing in groups and will put in consistent case and x x; skip if you need traditional lecture-first teaching.

Four answers before you build your schedule.

FairEffort

Challenging

Mandatory

WorthIt

See how this professor fits your week.

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

In person

Online

See what students actually said.

🎯 Teaching Quality

🧪 Hands-On Method

⚠️ Polarized Lectures

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

❤️ About Character

See exactly what the AI read.

Quality ratings

Course coverage

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

A range

B range

C range

D range

F

No letter grade reported

if you learn by doing in groups and will put in consistent case and ; skip if you need traditional lecture-first teaching.