AI Rate Professor

Art

Davettia Hill

PHOT1 · ARTH4 · 63565D · PHOTO1 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
1.4/5
Take again
14.29%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Skip this professor unless you must; easy-ish grades do not make up for poor teaching and tense class climate.

Best fit · Self Taught ProMandatory participationDense readingsLecture heavyEmotional rantsSkip class fail
  • Most students warn , and forced participation.
  • Grades can be manageable with , but teaching quality is widely panned.
  • Attendance and participation are treated as non-negotiable.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Several students report easy As with and few graded items despite weak teaching.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content difficulty is moderate overall, but and heavy memorization raise the intellectual load.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

Tags and and you will not pass, with strict participation pressure.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Six of and quality scores cluster at 1.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

As are common with , but and trick questions.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Weekly dense readings, photo memorization, papers, and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

22/100

Students describe circular lectures, unanswered questions, and long emotional rants instead of teaching.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of papers, participation, quizzes, midterm, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person classes feature long dense readings, mandatory participation, lecture-heavy style, and frequent complaints about rants and .

Main concern

, and heavy memorization for little learning payoff.

What students said

“ .”
ARTH4
“Easy A but INEPT professor.”
PHOTO1
“ !”
PHOT1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams lean on dense memorization and trick questions with weak study guides, so risk feels high.

Trick questionsHeavy memorizationQuizzes and midterm finalInconsistent study guides

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and papers with trick questions and heavy memorization.

Trick questionsMemorize photos and detailsQuizzes midterm finalExtra credit available
“ and will often give trick questions.”
PHOT1
“makes u memorize 20-30 photos (& their photographers, ”
PHOT1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Took his art theory class and he was the craziest professor I've had so far... .”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 in-person reviews, highlighting teaching problems, participation pressure, and grade ease. Credibility rating: High.

🎭 Class Climate

20/100

“He took it personal if you didn't participate and would go on long emotional rants about how we hurt his feelings.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“Lectures went in circles and he doesnt directly answer students questions.”

📈 Easy Grade Trap

78/100

“Easy A but INEPT professor.”

🚫

18/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Spends half the class ranting about lack of participation
  • Lectures went in circles
  • would cut off your answers to correct you

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A but INEPT professor
  • Got an A only because he provides a lot of EC
  • memorization/

Theme 3

⚠️ About Class Climate

  • long emotional rants
  • Lots of uncomfortable jokes
  • believe this man is slightly racist

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Seven detailed reviews from 2018-2019 show consistent negative teaching themes and solid grade detail.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ARTH43 reviews
PHOT12 reviews
63565D1 review
PHOTO11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values