AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Catherine Famiglietti

MATH253 · MATH124 · MATH353 · MATH351 · MATH160 · MATH4A · MATH2 · CALCULUS · MA2 · TRIG · 3A · MATH11 · MATH3A · TRIG124 · 54 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
73.33%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you want a and will do the homework and go to class; do not expect a free A.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear Thorough LecturesCaring and PatientLecture HeavyTough but Fair TestsAccessible Office Hours
  • and is widely described as sweet, patient, and .
  • Quizzes often come from homework or textbook problems, but and .
  • as essential .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Many students earn As by doing homework and reviewing notes, but and .

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Course difficulty sits around average math load: , yet pace and abstract material still challenge weaker students.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

40/100

as mandatory or framed as skip-class-and-you-will-not-pass, so skipping is risky.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

Most students praise her clarity and care and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Some call her a , while others note curves, , and fair criteria.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

, and quizzes are common and often described as lots of work.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

, and strong office-hour support.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Quizzes, multiple midterms, and a .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person math classes feel lecture-heavy and structured, with , and exams that reward steady practice.

Main concern

Some tests feel harder than lectures and .

What students said

“ and thorough with lectures.”
MATH4A
“She is a but the .”
MATH4A
“You will have to work very hard for an A or B.”
MATH2

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and , but difficulty and strict grading keep them only moderately student-friendly.

Homework-aligned quizzesIn-person examsNo calculator on some testsOccasional curve

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tests often pull from homework or textbook-style problems; some sections ban calculators and feel harder than class examples.

In-person examsHomework-based quizzesNo calculator at timesTest-heavy grade
“The questions come directly from the homework.”
MATH4A
“The , and I found them to be straightforward”
MATH2
“5 quizzes... 3 tests worth 45%, and final worth 35%.”
MATH4A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Somehow, she made 4A so easy, and yet I learned so much at the same time.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 in-person , and care. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Clarity

78/100

“ and thorough with lectures.”

❤️ Caring Support

80/100

“She genuinely cares about her students and wants them to succeed.”

📈 Grade Reality

52/100

“You will have to work very hard for an A or B.”

👍

74/100

“If you want to take Math 253, she is great.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and thorough with lectures.
  • Lectures may be boring, but and does examples.
  • She writes everything out on the board

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • She is a but the .
  • You will have to work very hard for an A or B.
  • If you do the homework and ask her for help... You can definitely get an A

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Professor Famiglietti is one of the sweetest professors I've had.
  • She's really friendly and approachable.
  • and nice!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

54

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty detailed in-person reviews across many years show consistent themes on teaching quality, workload, and exams.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 536
4 out of 59
3 out of 53
2 out of 53
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH215 reviews
MATH3A9 reviews
MATH1245 reviews
MATH3534 reviews
MATH4A4 reviews
Show 9 more courses
3A3 reviews
MATH112 reviews
MATH2532 reviews
CALCULUS1 review
MA21 review
MATH1601 review
MATH3511 review
TRIG1 review
TRIG1241 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

23 reported outcomes

A range

12

A+ 2 · A 10

B range

5

B+ 2 · B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D- 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 3 · Rather_Not_Say 1