AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Alina Daych

MATH8 · MATH353 · MATH351 · MATH2 · CALC1 · MATHG115 · MATH11 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

; you will likely relearn everything with a tutor and and tests.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing LecturesPop Quiz AmbushNo Study GuidesUnhelpful FeedbackAvoid for Math
  • Lectures are widely described as and tests.
  • Surprise pop quizzes and support.
  • Near-zero recommendation and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

24/100

Tough grading, no curve, and hard even with effort.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Material itself is standard math difficulty, but poor teaching and surprise assessments make it feel much harder.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and warn that skipping means you will not pass.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Would-take-again is 0% and comments repeatedly call her the .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

; and tests that feel disconnected from what was taught.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Lots of and long timed tests pile on stress.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

16/100

Dominant theme , and students teaching each other instead.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Pop quizzes and ; .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, heavy homework that often does not count, and weak exam alignment.

Main concern

You learn little from lecture yet and .

What students said

“Terrible teacher! She reads off of her notes and .”
MATH2
“53% of the class did not pass the and .”
CALC1
“All of her poor lectures have nothing to do with the questions that will .”
MATH353

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Surprise pop quizzes and strict, high-risk assessment environment.

Pop quizzesNo useful study guideHarder tests than lecturesNo curve

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Pop quizzes appear without warning and exams are described as poorly aligned with class examples.

Pop quizzesWeak study guidesTimed hard tests
“There are and she doesn't give you study guide preparations for the exams.”
MATH2
“Doesn't really give study guide, and if she does it has nothing to do with the test.”
MATH8

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“THE . she doesnt teach you anything. Gives you a lot of . just makes you annoyed and hate math!”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 in-person reviews, , and near-zero recommendation. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Teaching Quality

16/100

“Lectures are impossible to understand, I had to relearn every lesson with a tutor after each class.”

⚠️

25/100

“BEWARE OF POP QUIZZES”

👎 Recommendation

8/100

“ .”

📉

28/100

“Only about 10% of the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She reads off of her notes and .
  • She literally whispers during lecture.
  • students learn more from each other than the teacher.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • 53% of the class did not pass the and .
  • .
  • If you want a .

Theme 3

⚠️

  • She didn't have office hours so we couldn't get help.
  • Does not provide a study guid for tests.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

12 mostly negative in-person reviews are consistent on teaching quality, though older and limited in grade detail.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 57

Course coverage

MATH25 reviews
MATH112 reviews
CALC11 review
MATH3511 review
MATH3531 review
Show 2 more courses
MATH81 review
MATHG1151 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2