AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Philippe Relouzat

MATH253 · MATH353 · MATH170 · MATH105 · IVCMATH105 · ALGEB353 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

unless and only need a low-pressure elementary algebra seat.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing Board NotesOften LateCourse Quality VariesLenient if You TrySelf-Study Required
  • Later MATH105/hybrid experiences are chaotic: .
  • Older elementary algebra reviews paint him as chill, easy, and eager for students to earn A's.
  • Overall recommendation is weak; success often means teaching yourself from the book or ALEKS.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Lower courses can yield high marks with light effort, but and weak teaching still leave grades unpredictable.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Elementary algebra sections are described as very easy; higher or hybrid sections feel muddled more than conceptually deep.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

82/100

Many students stopped coming and .

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Would-take-again is 0% and recent students urge avoidance despite some older easy-A praise.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

64/100

Several students report B/A grades for little effort and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

58/100

Older sections felt light; but classroom demand was often low.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

lectures, and notes students call gibberish.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Mix of quizzes, tests, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

older MATH353 felt easy and supportive, while MATH105/hybrid sections felt confusing and poorly run.

Main concern

Unclear lectures and .

What students said

“ !”
MATH170
“I would look back at my notes and they looked like gibberish from what I copied from Relouzat's notes.”
MATH105
“He really wants you to get an A and makes it very possible to do so.”
MATH353

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Quizzes can feel easy while tests feel different from notes; .

Quizzes and testsALEKS requiredMismatch between notes and tests

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students report easy quizzes but .

Weekly quizzes late termTests differ from notesALEKS homework
“A lot of , but then D's and .”
MATH105
“Tests seems as though they were a lot different from the notes.”
MATH105

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 in-person reviews, highlighting the split between easy older sections and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Recent Teaching Quality

34/100

“No one in class had any idea what was going on all semester.”

🟢 Easy A Potential

58/100

“very Easy class and i barely tried!”

⏰ Reliability Issues

25/100

“He came late to every class (30 minutes late the day of the final).”

👎 Recommendation

28/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • He would write jumbled notes on the board nobody would understand.
  • Excellent,calm and quiet professor.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Got a B for barely trying.
  • He really wants you to get an A and makes it very possible to do so.
  • if you at least try to show your work somewhat.

Theme 3

📚

  • I ended up just learning out of the book..
  • Learn online.
  • I honestly did learn more on the website though than Relouzat.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

14 in-person reviews show a ; sample is modest and somewhat dated.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 54
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATH1055 reviews
MATH3534 reviews
MATH2532 reviews
ALGEB3531 review
IVCMATH1051 review
Show 1 more courses
MATH1701 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Pass 1 · Rather_Not_Say 1