AI Rate Professor

Writing

Allison Schmitendorf

WR399 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you want a and are ready to invest serious time in homework and essays.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring mentorHeavy writing loadClear explanationsAccessible outside classHighly recommended
  • , and and reading.
  • Heavy workload with lots of readings and .
  • An A is achievable if you put in the work; .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

An A is realistic only if and essays carefully; both students stress hard work, not .

All evidence comes from in-person WR399 reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Writing concepts are teachable with her help, but readings and and practical load solidly standard-to-challenging.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

as mandatory with no flexibility described.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

Both students , and call her the best or and teaching.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Grades feel fair if work is thorough; one reported A after hard work, not automatic leniency.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of , and six essays make the class time-intensive.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Excellent

94/100

Students rave about clear explanations, care, humor, accessibility, and .

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Assessment centers on essays, readings, and ongoing writing rather than formal exams.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person WR399 feels supportive and eye-opening, with strong feedback and accessibility, but and .

Main concern

.

What students said

“LOVE THIS PROFESSOR! Professor Schmitendorf really opened my eyes on writing and reading.”
WR399
“There is a lot of readings and 6 essays which is hard but .”
WR399

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize essays and .

Essay-focusedNo formal exam details

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Course is driven by readings and multiple essays; .

Multiple essaysHeavy readings
“There is a lot of readings and 6 essays which is hard but .”
WR399

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“LOVE THIS PROFESSOR! Professor Schmitendorf really opened my eyes on writing and reading. She absolutely cares about her students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews, highlighting care, writing growth, and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

94/100

“She teaches great however, she gives a lot of homework. This class requires a lot of time but if you work hard, you can get an A.”

❤️ Student Support

92/100

“she was always willing to talk to me and answer all and other things.”

📚 Workload Reality

28/100

“There is a lot of readings and 6 essays which is hard but .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • if you work hard, you can get an A
  • There is a lot of readings and 6 essays which is hard
  • This class requires a lot of time

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She absolutely cares about her students
  • Prof Schmitendorf is the best !
  • Hilarious

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only two detailed 2017 reviews exist; opinions are consistent but the sample is too small and dated for high confidence.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

WR3992 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values