AI Rate Professor

Writing

Doug Hesse

WR1 · WRABCD · WRITING2 · WRI1 · WR301 · WRWR · WR2 · WRITT201 · 22 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you want to grow as a writer and are ready to work hard for .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring MentorTough Fair GraderHilariousBest Writing FeedbackHigh Workload Essays
  • Students call him one of the best and most human writing teachers.
  • but is a .
  • Workload is heavy with multiple essays and weekly papers; As require real effort.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Comments repeatedly say As and he is a .

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Writing content is approachable and chill in lecture, but .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

and skipping hurts your chance to pass.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Despite sparse take-again data, most and care.

All evidence is from in-person reviews; and skewed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Tough on essays but widely described as , and focused on improvement.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Multiple essays, weekly short papers, and sometimes a .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Praised as hilarious, caring, thought-provoking, and the .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Course centers on essays and weekly papers; .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

22 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and growth-focused, with and serious essay work.

Main concern

Heavy essay load and A.

What students said

“Hands down the .”
WR1
“Doug gave the I have ever had.”
WRITING2
“ , unless your a great writer.”
WR2

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and occasional long paper finals rather than sit-down tests.

Multiple EssaysWeekly Short PapersPaper FinalNo Traditional Exam

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

papers, and sometimes an 18-page final; traditional closed-book exams are not clearly described.

Multiple EssaysWeekly Short PapersPaper FinalNo Traditional Exam
“there are 4 essays papers plus there are weekly 1 or 2 page paper assignments. The final is around 18 pages.”
WR2
“Wrote 4 essays and .”
WR1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Hands down the . He talks to the class like you are all just human beings”

Voice snapshots generated from 22 , and recommendation. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“Not only is he a great professor, but also an awesome human being.”

📝

92/100

“Doug gave the I have ever had.”

⚖️

48/100

“Though but fair and helpful.”

📚 Workload for an A

35/100

“must work hard to get an A in class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures are very chill and relaxed but VERY thought-provoking
  • Super funny guy and genuinely cared about everyone in class
  • Extremely laid back and cares about his students

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • if you want an easy A
  • getting an A is not easy in his class
  • I, however, did work my gluteus maximus off to get an A

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • I wish he was my father
  • Awesome human being!
  • HE IS AMAZING. REALLY EASY. WANTS YOU TO PASS & HILARIOUSSSS

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

22

Recent reviews read by the AI

22

Lifetime ratings

85/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-two reviews spanning 2011-2017 with rich detail and strong consensus on care and workload.

Inside 22 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

WR18 reviews
WR26 reviews
WR3012 reviews
629101 review
WRABCD1 review
Show 4 more courses
WRI11 review
WRITING21 review
WRITT2011 review
WRWR1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 3 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Audit/No Grade 1