AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Louise Kleszyk

PHIL1 · PHIL300 · PHIL2 · PHIL104 · PHIL3 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if , and engage; skip if you need flashy lectures or guaranteed easy A.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPassionate LecturesPaper FocusedNotes on ExamsBoring for SomeHelpful Office Hours
  • Many students love her passion and
  • Grades are often strong if , and
  • Lectures can feel boring or PPT-heavy, and a

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Many earn As by attending and taking notes, but and it is not a free walk-in A.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

, though abstract material still requires real thinking.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Most comments stress that attending class and participating is essential to succeed.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

Strong praise for clarity and support outweighs boredom and a .

All evidence is from in-person reviews; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Revisions and note use help, but some call her a tough or .

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Reading, papers, participation, and occasional Star Trek responses create steady work.

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Passionate and clear for many students, though others find lectures boring or vague.

Format shift

In-person only.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

42/100

Papers, essays, and .

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and note-taking; many A grades, mixed views on lecture excitement.

Main concern

Boring lectures for some and .

What students said

“She'll let you .”
PHIL104
“I never read any of her blog posts nor the assigned materials and aced the class.”
PHIL1
“Greatest philosophy teacher hands down!”
PHIL2

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Essays and than high-tech proctoring.

Notes Allowed on ExamsWritten EssaysPaper RevisionsIn-Class Essay

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and quote work, often with notes allowed on part of tests.

Notes Allowed on ExamsWritten EssaysPaper Revisions
“She'll let you use your notes during essays. .”
PHIL104
“She lets you use your notes on part of the midterm and final!!”
62775

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Greatest philosophy teacher hands down!”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 , and mixed lecture energy. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“She takes a subject that is challenging and teaches it in a way so that you can understand abstract material.”

📝 Notes-Friendly Exams

78/100

“She'll let you .”

😴 Lecture Energy Split

45/100

“Extremely boring so get ready to yawn all night.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's so passionate about her field.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Not an easy A but if you are willing to learn it is an amazing class!
  • She'll .
  • I never read any of her blog posts nor the assigned materials and aced the class.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She is super sweet and very helpful.
  • LOVED her. SUPER sweet and very helpful.
  • Always willing to help

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

and courses show consistent core themes with some polarity.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 54
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

PHIL15 reviews
PHIL25 reviews
PHIL1043 reviews
627751 review
637901 review
Show 3 more courses
637951 review
PHIL31 review
PHIL3001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

8

A 8

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1