AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Jenifer Kalamian

HUM27 · PHIL1 · PHILO1 · PHIL2 · PHIL3 · PHIL6529 · PHILOSOPHY1 · PHILPHIL · PHILI · 34 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
1.8

The decision

if you attend, do short HW, and stay open-minded.

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy A gemSpoon-feeds examsEngaging discussion lecturesLight weekly homeworkExtra credit friendly
  • Consistently rated one of the easiest and most engaging philosophy/humanities professors.
  • and .
  • A few students note political slant; open-minded students thrive.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

92/100

Nearly every review says do the short HW, attend review, and the A is straightforward with cushion.

.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

88/100

Content is ; intellectual load stays light.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

Often listed mandatory or crucial because tests come from lectures, though .

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

94/100

Overwhelming praise for , and real learning; only sparse political-bias complaints.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

90/100

Fair to generous grading on short papers, exam review of exact content, and regular .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

84/100

About ten short and final; textbook mainly for HW.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

93/100

Students repeatedly , and discussion-driven.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Weekly short essays dominate; and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

34 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

and world religions with light weekly writing, exam reviews, and plentiful .

Main concern

Some find lectures politically one-sided or too personal; .

What students said

“If you show up, pay attention, and do all the homework assignments (10) it's an easy A.”
HUM27
“She will spoon feed you the and final.”
PHIL1
“as long as you do the !”
PHIL1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

She reviews nearly the and .

Exam review lectureSpoon-fed answersStraightforward essay and MCExtra credit available

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

88/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and finals are heavily reviewed and match lecture content.

Pre-exam full reviewLecture-based questionsEasy if notes taken
“She will spoon feed you the and final.”
PHIL1
“She literally goes over the . Only a midterm and final”
HUM27

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She's AMAZING! I honestly wish she taught all of my classes at IVC.”

Voice snapshots generated from 34 in-person , and near-universal recommendation. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

93/100

“By far the . She is so on top of everything and actually reads your papers unlike most professors.”

⭐ Easy A

92/100

“Easy A, great teacher.”

👍

94/100

“ !”

📝 Light Workload

84/100

“The whole class is and a final.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures are highly interesting to listen to and she makes it fun too.
  • She gets you to open up your mind and you really do learn a lot
  • Funny, smart and definitely knows what she's talking about.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • as long as you do the !
  • .
  • She will spoon feed you the and final.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • if you ever have any questions.
  • She's super easy. Easy class.
  • I absolutely LOVE prof. Kalamian!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

34

Recent reviews read by the AI

34

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-four detailed in-person reviews over several years with strong consensus on easiness, teaching quality, and structure.

Inside 34 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 528
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL117 reviews
HUM276 reviews
PHIL33 reviews
PHIL22 reviews
892321 review
Show 5 more courses
PHIL65291 review
PHILI1 review
PHILO11 review
PHILOSOPHY11 review
PHILPHIL1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 5 · A 4

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values