AI Rate Professor

Computer Information Systems

John Beaty

CIM108 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Limited data suggests you can pass well if self-directed, but expect uneven organization and slow lectures.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnorganized at timesHelpful when presentGroup projects matterSlow long lecturesEasy A+ possible
  • Only two reviews, both A+ but mixed teaching quality
  • ; the other finds him knowledgeable and helpful
  • Attendance and participation matter in group-project heavy CIM108

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

Both reported grades are A+, suggesting high grades are attainable even with mixed teaching.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Difficulty ratings are low to moderate; content seems manageable with group work and participation.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

; another says attendance is mandatory with participation weight.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

vibe for the other.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

85/100

Both students report A+ outcomes.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Moderate

60/100

Group projects and participation add work; overall difficulty not described as heavy.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Knows the material and can help, but organization and lecture pace draw criticism.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Emphasis on group projects and .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Two CIM108 in-person reviews: solid content knowledge and A+ grades, but uneven organization and long slow lectures.

Main concern

Teaching can feel like a side job; unorganized and slow lectures.

What students said

“Unorganized and it seems like teaching is a sidejob that he often forgets he has.”
CIM108
“Good professor, knows what he's . Just keep in mind he does do group projects, participation does matter quite a bit, and his lectures are a bit slow and long.”
CIM108

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; assessment appears project and participation based.

Group projectsParticipation weight

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and participation, not proctoring or .

Group projectsParticipation
“he does do group projects, participation does matter quite a bit”
CIM108

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Unorganized and it seems like teaching is a sidejob that he often forgets he has.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews with mixed quality signals. Credibility rating: Low.

📚 Content Knowledge

70/100

“Good professor, knows what he's .”

🗂️ Organization

30/100

“Unorganized and it seems like teaching is a sidejob that he often forgets he has.”

🎯 Grade Outcomes

80/100

“A+”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • lectures are a bit slow and long, but overall, a good class.
  • teaching is a sidejob that he often forgets he has.

Theme 2

👥 About Class Structure

  • he does do group projects, participation does matter quite a bit

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only 2 reviews from late 2015 to early 2016 with and little assessment detail.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CIM1082 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values