AI Rate Professor

Law

Irene Reynolds

LGL202 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Avoid unless you can teach yourself legal tech and litigation material from the book alone.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnprepared LecturesConfusing ExplainerTextbook ReaderDo Not TakeIrrelevant Tests
  • Most students say she is unprepared and confuses core concepts.
  • Workload includes lots of .
  • Several warn the course content and tests feel irrelevant to the stated class.
  • A rare positive review still notes complicated IP law content.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Some students still get As, but others report a D, doomed litigation gaps, and ridiculous irrelevant tests.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Content spans complicated IP law and litigation material that many say is poorly taught.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Multiple reviews say attendance is mandatory or she gets students to show up for class.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most students and bluntly tell others not to bother.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

Grade outcomes range from A to D with .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Students report lots of , and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

Dominant feedback , and poor explanations.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

65/100

Comments emphasize tests, a final, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly negative about preparation, explanation quality, tech problems, and mismatched tests.

Main concern

, and tests that miss the course purpose.

What students said

“This professor comes to class utterly unprepared, then proceeds to READ from the textbook trying to lecture.”
LGL202
“Irene is a and a terrible at explaining concepts related to this class.”
LGL202
“ .”
LGL202

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are described as tough, sometimes irrelevant, and tied to dense litigation material with little lecture support.

Challenging TestsLitigation Graph On TestsIrrelevant Test Content

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and say key litigation material appears on exams after brief coverage.

Challenging TestsLitigation Graph On TestsIrrelevant Test Content
“ and were on subjects that were't relevant to what was suppose to be taught in this course.”
LGL202
“She had one slide on litigation that was a pretty long graph of the whole process that she went over for a few seconds but we had to have it written down for all the tests and final.”
LGL202

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Don't bother.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 in-person reviews, highlighting unprepared teaching and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Teaching Quality

20/100

“This professor comes to class utterly unprepared, then proceeds to READ from the textbook trying to lecture.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

18/100

“ .”

📚 Course Mismatch

30/100

“ and were on subjects that were't relevant to what was suppose to be taught in this course.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Irene is a and a terrible at explaining concepts related to this class.
  • This professor comes to class utterly unprepared, then proceeds to READ from the textbook trying to lecture.
  • Also, in a computer class, she manages to encounter technological problems week after week.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Lots of and assignments.
  • if you don't know lit. you're doomed.
  • and were on subjects that were't relevant to what was suppose to be taught in this course.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Overall Advice

  • .
  • Don't bother.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Seven mostly detailed reviews from 2013-2016 show strong negative consistency with one outlier praise.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 54

Course coverage

LGL2027 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1