AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Jia Xu

HD101 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Avoid unless you have no choice; plan to reverse-engineer vague weekly assignments with almost no guidance.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear assignmentsChanges expectationsRudeBoring lecturesNo late work
  • Students describe unclear, shifting assignment expectations that .
  • Lectures feel long, repetitive, and easy to zone out of.
  • Multiple students and call the class disappointing.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

One student still earned an A, but , and heavy weekly work make an A costly and stressful.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Difficulty comes less from content brilliance and and boring long lectures.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

, with little sense that class time clarifies the work.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Every review is strongly negative and students explicitly .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Students report surprise Fs, no late work, and marks for missing materials she seemed to accept earlier.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

A handful of different weekly assignments plus multiple exams create steady, high friction workload.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Reviews hammer rudeness, confusion, late emails, and lectures that leave the class lost or zoned out.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Weekly unclear assignments dominate, with three exams also mentioned.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person HD101-style reviews are , and teaching helpfulness.

Main concern

You may not know what is expected until you get an F back on work.

What students said

“Shes rude and not helpful. It took the class about 2 months to understand what she wanted”
65260
“ . She changes her mind all the time”
HD101
“ ”
HD101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are mentioned but the bigger pain is unclear weekly work rather than a .

Three examsWeekly assignmentsNo late work

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews mention three exams and frequent graded assignments without detailing proctoring or open-book policy.

Three examsWeekly assignmentsNo late work
“has 3 exams, emails back very late”
HD101
“Does not except late work and expects participation”
HD101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She's just awful. Fire her.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 consistently negative in-person reviews from 2015. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“Shes rude and not helpful. It took the class about 2 months to understand what she wanted on the weekly assig.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

12/100

“ .”

📋 Assignment Clarity

20/100

“ . She changes her mind all the time so ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures were repetitive and half the class zoned out
  • She lectures for a long time so class gets boring
  • , yet too much detail

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • you never knew what she expected on assignments until you got it back with an F
  • expected
  • Does not except late work

Theme 3

💔 About Character

  • Shes rude and not helpful
  • I was looking forward to this class and was very disappointed

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Only four reviews, all from 2015 and tightly consistent in complaints, so the but the sample is small.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 51

Course coverage

HD1013 reviews
652601 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values