AI Rate Professor

Business Sciences

Timothy Rabun

LAW · MGT12A · BUS12 · MA · BUSL19 · MGMT12A · LGL208 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you will attend, participate, and do briefs; skip if you need tight structure and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardKnowledgeable practitionerMandatory attendanceDisorganized at timesInteractive law casesHelpful if you engage
  • Strong subject knowledge and practical business-law insight when lectures work
  • ; some say lectures are long or slide-reading

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

He can pad grades for strong other work, but and effort.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Material is practical but detailed; tests and and notes.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Students report mandatory attendance with .

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

Many praise his expertise and support, but avoid-level complaints about disorganization pull the average down.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Wants students to pass and may reward non-test work, though tests can be detailed.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Expect chapter outlines, case briefs, oral arguments, and several tests.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

Knowledgeable and often engaging, yet some classes feel like reading slides or winging it without materials.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of outlines, briefs, oral argument, participation, and multiple tests.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person business and law courses show deep knowledge and interactive methods, but and occasional disorganization create a split student experience.

Main concern

and inconsistent organization can hurt grades even when content is solid.

What students said

“He goes out of his way to make sure you walk away with a passing grade.”
MGMT12A
“I was told my grade would be dropped 30% because of attendance.”
LGL208
“ . Always blamed the book publisher for .”
LAW

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are described as detailed and book-based; strong other .

Detailed testsCase summariesMultiple exams

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; outlines and .

Detailed testsCase briefsChapter outlines
“ .”
MGT12A
“If you're not good at his tests he will give you a good grade if you do well on all the other work.”
MGMT12A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Prof Rabun is the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 in-person reviews, balancing expertise praise with attendance and organization concerns. Credibility rating: Medium.

📚 Subject Mastery

80/100

“He knows the subject matter like the back of his hand.”

📍

20/100

“I was told my grade would be dropped 30% because of attendance.”

⚠️ Organization Issues

40/100

“ . Always blamed the book publisher for .”

👍 Recommendation Split

72/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • his teaching methods are fun and interactive
  • He makes the material very interesting
  • Sit in the front and ask questions

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and case summaries
  • Gives about 4-5 tests
  • We never knew our grades until the end of the semester

Theme 3

⚠️ About Drawbacks

  • The entire class was
  • Avoid if you can
  • Always changing things

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

10 older in-person reviews (2008-2015) are detailed but split between glowing and .

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

BUS122 reviews
LGL2082 reviews
MGMT12A2 reviews
BUSL191 review
LAW1 review
Show 2 more courses
MA1 review
MGT12A1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values