AI Rate Professor

English

Marjorie Luesebrink

LIT45 · WRT2 · WR1 · WRIT6319 · WR10 · CR11 · WRITING1 · WRITING2 · WRWR · WRIT2 · CW2 · ENGLISH · LIT20 · WR2 · 31 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you can , and use rewrites; otherwise pick a clearer writing professor.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTangent-heavy lecturesRewrites allowedUnclear promptsWeird but memorableHeavy reading
  • Many call lectures confusing, off-topic, or
  • Rewrites and some
  • , and rigid preferred structures frustrate others

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

65/100

and unlimited rewrites help grades, but you must match her structure and keep up with .

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Content difficulty varies; many find lectures useless while papers and books still demand real work.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

Some note limited absences allowed and that missing lectures leaves you behind even if content feels pointless.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

38/100

A sizable , while others like rewrites and culture-focused help.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Rewrites and effort-based grading often rescue scores despite picky expectations.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Multiple books, weekly exercises, and a and writing load.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Frequent complaints about tangents, confusion, and rudeness outweigh praise for feedback and personality.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

, and a long research paper more than timed exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

31 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person writing and lit classes are polarizing: , and odd classroom behavior.

Main concern

and off-topic lectures make independent decoding of what she wants essential.

What students said

“She goes off on the .”
WR2
“she lets you re-write your papers with her added help, and is a .”
WRIT2
“ and wants you to write in her perspective instead of yours.”
WR2

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is paper-heavy with in-class essay exams; friendliness comes .

In-class essaysResearch paperMidterm and final essaysRewrites on papers

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and final in-class essays plus a long research paper.

In-class essays10-12 page research paperEssay rewrites
“ and one final (both in class essays), and one research paper 10-12 pages long.”
WR2
“She lets you re-write the essays as much as you want.”
WR2

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Always goes off tangents and talks about nonsense for the entire class period.”

Voice snapshots generated from 31 in-person reviews, highlighting tangents, rewrites, and heavy papers. Credibility rating: High.

🌀 Lecture Tangents

30/100

“She goes off on the .”

📝 Rewrite Lifeline

72/100

“Good thing she !”

📚

32/100

“I had to finish 6+ books in under a month in for the .”

⚠️

35/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures are 95% jargon
  • she goes off on hardcore tangents EVERY DAY
  • Weird Weird Weird

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A if you give some effort
  • she

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • A LOT of
  • Final paper will be long (10+ Pgs.)
  • She expects you to buy ridiculous amount of book

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

31

Recent reviews read by the AI

31

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

31 reviews spanning many years show a consistent split pattern of .

Inside 31 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 56
3 out of 56
2 out of 56
1 out of 57

Course coverage

WR211 reviews
WR13 reviews
WRITING23 reviews
LIT452 reviews
WRIT22 reviews
Show 9 more courses
WRITING12 reviews
CR111 review
CW21 review
ENGLISH1 review
LIT201 review
WR101 review
WRIT63191 review
WRT21 review
WRWR1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values