AI Rate Professor

Writing

Mark Fullmer

WR2 · ENGL100 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
97/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

if , and skill-building without crushing difficulty.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyBest writing professorMakes writing funLaid-back and caringDraft feedback goldProgress-based grading
  • Students overwhelmingly call him the .
  • He , and grades on progress.
  • Course is manageable if you do the papers; not pure free A but clearly student-friendly.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Doing the writing work and using his feedback typically yields a strong grade without crushing stress.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

and enjoyable, though writing practice still requires real effort.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

, but and the vibe is not rigidly punitive.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

and perfect high quality ratings across reviews.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

Progress-based grading, light late penalties, and if you engage.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

76/100

Main work is long writing assignments and conferences rather than constant busywork.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students credit him with making writing fun, giving sincere help, and massively improving their skills.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

, and conferences rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person WR2/English students rave about fun classes, sincere care, strong writing growth, and .

Main concern

You still must write and revise; and low-effort students can land low grades.

What students said

“honestly, the !”
WR2
“Before turning in your final paper, you have to submit a first draft, which he'll proof read and .”
101
“An A if you just do the work”
ENGL100

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on writing assignments with .

Paper and draft basedProofread first draftsNo heavy exam focusProgress-based evaluation

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

88/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

proofreads, and helpful conferences.

First draft feedbackLong writing assignmentsConferencesProgress-based grading
“Before turning in your final paper, you have to submit a first draft, which he'll proof read and .”
101
“ .”
WR2
“he grades you based on your own progress.”
WR2

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“honestly, the ! ... your actually gonna want to come to writing class and enjoy it.”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 in-person reviews, highlighting teaching excellence, writing growth, and friendly workload. Credibility rating: High.

🌟 Teaching Quality

96/100

“He is by far the :)”

👍

96/100

“ !!!”

✍️ Writing Growth

90/100

“He drastically improved my writing skills.”

🎯 Easy Reward

82/100

“An A if you just do the work”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He makes every class fun and enjoyable.
  • very laid back and extremely easy.
  • Makes you feel like a friend and not a student.

Theme 2

📝 About Writing & Grades

  • Grade is mostly .
  • he grades you based on your own progress.
  • Of course his class is not an easy A and you have to work at it

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Mark is an awesome professor who SINCERELY cares
  • great guy, class wasnt too hard.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

17 consistently glowing in-person reviews with rich detail; slightly older overall but highly coherent.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 517
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

WR215 reviews
1011 review
ENGL1001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values