AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Nichole Johnson

CHEM3 · CHEMISTRY3 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

Avoid CHEM3 with her unless you already know chemistry well and and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerDeath by PowerPointTrick questionsNo study guidesMonotone lecturesHarsh on beginners
  • Most students describe lectures as .
  • Tests often hit fleeting comments and feel ambiguous or unfair to beginners.
  • A few say she knows the material, but the if you have another option.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Students report barely passing with a and labs because tests and quizzes dominate and feel unfair.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

18/100

Heavy math-based chemistry with fast coverage, memorization of many equations, and exams on lightly covered comments make the content feel brutal.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

, so flexibility cannot be confirmed either way.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most reviews strongly , and little support.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Students say , and test mistakes sink the grade even when homework is complete.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

, and a comprehensive final stack into a heavy load.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Dominant , and unhelpful responses to questions.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Quizzes and multiple hard exams, including a and labs in student stress.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person CHEM3 students largely report PowerPoint-heavy monotone lectures, trick or offhand exam questions, weak help for beginners, and .

Main concern

Ambiguous or hard even when homework and labs are done.

What students said

“Death by Powerpoint... .”
CHEM3
“one of the . ”
CHEM3
“asks some trick questions on the exams”
CHEM3

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are described as hard, often testing one-off comments without review sheets, which feels punitive for beginners.

Trick questionsNo study guideComprehensive finalAmbiguous quizzes

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and quizzes hit fleeting comments, use ambiguous wording, and lack review materials before exams.

Trick questionsNo study guideComprehensive final
“ we did not go into depth about”
CHEM3
“she does not provide a study guide or a ”
CHEM3

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“one of the . tests are ridiculous, asking questions on things she may have mentioned once in class”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 in-person CHEM3 reviews, , and low recommendation. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“Death by Powerpoint... Her voice is monotone and makes lecture miserable.”

👎 Recommendation

18/100

“If you have other options when choosing .”

📝

28/100

“covers a lot of material during lectures but we did not go into depth about.”

⚖️

22/100

“says she will grade on a her mistakes.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Death by power point, no study guide or review for the exam
  • She teaches as students in the class have prior knowledge about chemistry
  • her only two responses are You should know that or I taught that in class

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I'm barely passing with a 'C' because of her tests and quizzes
  • asks some trick questions on the exams

Theme 3

💬 About Support

  • she is terrible at responding to e-mails

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Ten consistent mostly negative CHEM3 reviews from 2011-2013 provide a , but they are older and lack grade or .

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 54
1 out of 53

Course coverage

CHEM39 reviews
CHEMISTRY31 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values