AI Rate Professor

English

Erin McNellis

WR1 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

the only review says hard work did .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnhelpful paper feedbackStuck mid-B gradesFeminist-heavy readingsFour-paper workloadLow support
  • Only one detailed review exists, so conclusions are fragile.
  • Student did all homework and attended every class but stayed around 85-88 on papers.
  • a draft and said it looked good.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

Heavy , so an A does not look easy from the only review.

All .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Four papers and a light or brutal course.

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The student attended all classes, but the review .

All .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

The and the reading list monotonous despite strong effort.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

Papers stayed near 85 even after the professor previewed work and said it looked good.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

load.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

42/100

effortful student felt guidance did not help grades.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

and homework.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Single WR1 review describes solid attendance and useful feedback.

Main concern

reviews a draft herself.

What students said

“ and attended all classes. and she gave me 85/100 on the first three”
WR1
“Not helpful at all. for lack of variety.”
WR1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews center on paper .

Four papersHomeworkNo clear proctored exams mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person WR1 evidence focuses on four graded papers and .

Four papersHomework-based assessment
“ and she gave me 85/100 on the first three (even though on the third I had her look it over herself and she said, "It looks good").”
WR1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Not helpful at all. for lack of variety.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 and . Credibility rating: Low.

📝

42/100

“ .”

⚖️

38/100

“she gave me 85/100 on the first three (even though on the third I had her look it over herself and she said, "It looks good")”

📚 Course Content

52/100

“ for lack of variety.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and attended all classes
  • she gave me 85/100 on the first three
  • The and I got an 88

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • for lack of variety

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

18/100

Evidence confidence

A single 2013 review cannot establish a reliable pattern of teaching or grading.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

WR11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values