AI Rate Professor

Business Sciences

Guy Ormes

LGL203 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you want a rigorous legal-analysis course with a thorough, knowledgeable instructor and are ready to engage every class.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerThorough Legal InstructorChallenging Contracts & TortsFrequent Legal Analysis QuizzesExperienced & Knowledgeable
  • Experienced instructor who thoroughly explains challenging Contracts and Torts material.
  • Nearly every class includes a .
  • Single glowing 2013 review limits broader confidence in consistency.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Material is challenging and quizzes run nearly every class, so an A requires steady preparation rather than minimal effort.

Evidence comes only from one in-person LGL203 review.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Contracts and Torts content is described as challenging even though the .

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

; frequent in-class quizzes imply showing up matters but .

No online reviews; .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

The only review strongly praises him as thorough, experienced, and a major asset to the college.

Recommendation rests on one in-person review from 2013.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

No grade or ; fairness is assumed from high quality praise, not proven leniency.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Legal analysis quizzes nearly every class add steady work on top of challenging content.

Format shift

Workload detail is from the single in-person review.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Described as experienced, knowledgeable, and thorough in making sure students understand difficult legal topics.

Format shift

Based .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Frequent legal analysis quizzes are the main assessment detail mentioned.

Format shift

In-person only; no online assessment evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person LGL203 praised as thorough and knowledge-building despite challenging Contracts and Torts content, with .

Main concern

Only one old review; limited proof of .

What students said

“Professor Ormes is an experienced and knowledgeable instructor that IVC is lucky to have.”
LGL203
“ , but I learned so much from them!”
LGL203

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Nearly every class had a legal analysis quiz; .

Frequent Legal Analysis Quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

every class rather than a clearly described midterm or final.

Frequent Legal Analysis Quizzes
“ , but I learned so much from them!”
LGL203

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Ormes is an experienced and knowledgeable instructor that IVC is lucky to have.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review, highlighting teaching thoroughness and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Thoroughness

92/100

“the professor is very thorough to go over as much as he can to make sure every student has understanding”

📚

48/100

“ , but I learned so much from them!”

🧠 Challenging Content

28/100

“The material in Contracts and Torts are challenging”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • experienced and knowledgeable instructor
  • very thorough to go over as much as he can
  • IVC is lucky to have

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Work

  • material in Contracts and Torts are challenging
  • I learned so much from them!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only one detailed review from 2013; no grade data, tags, or .

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

LGL2031 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values