AI Rate Professor

Education

Chris Haynes

PS1 · POLSC3 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Proceed with caution; sparse conflicting reviews make him a risky .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear paper expectationsPolarizing qualityLecture-aligned examsExtra credit participationTextbook often unnecessary
  • Only two reviews exist and they sharply conflict across courses.
  • One PS1 , and easy debate work.
  • One POLSC3 review calls him unclear, rude, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

PS1 looked easy with and EC, but POLSC3 paper grading sounded unpredictable and harsh.

All ; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

One course felt mild and lecture-tied; the other felt .

All ; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly define a strict policy; only participation is mentioned.

Sparse in-person evidence only; no online comparison.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

One harsh review says he should never teach, outweighing a milder positive review given tiny sample size.

All ; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

The detailed negative review describes reversing paper demands and .

Format shift

In-person only; thin evidence.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

PS1 had no paper and an easy debate; POLSC3 centered on a .

Format shift

In-person only; thin evidence.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

One student found lectures mildly fine; , and unfit to teach.

Format shift

In-person only; thin evidence.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

and participation EC in one course versus high-stakes paper work in another.

Format shift

In-person only; thin evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

PS1 felt manageable and exam-based, while POLSC3 felt confusing and .

Main concern

and harsh interpersonal tone in at least one course.

What students said

“ and posts on blackboard. Gave for in class participation.”
PS1
“Terrible professor. Very unclear about expectations and .”
POLSC3

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

PS1 exams tracked lectures, while POLSC3 paper expectations were contested.

Lecture-based examsBlackboard postsIn-class debateMajor paper (other course)

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

PS1 exams came from lectures and Blackboard; POLSC3 comments focus on an .

Exams from lectureBlackboard contentExtra credit participationPaper expectations unclear
“ and posts on blackboard.”
PS1
“I had no idea what he wanted from the paper, after finding out and writing a and topics.”
POLSC3

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Terrible professor. Very unclear about expectations and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews with conflicting tone. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“Lectures were mildly interesting and went along with text, I wish I hadn't bought the text.”

📄 Paper Confusion

25/100

“Very unclear about expectations and .”

🧪 Assessment Ease (PS1)

70/100

“ .”

👎 Recommendation Risk

32/100

“He should never teach”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures were mildly interesting and went along with text
  • Rude to students

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and posts on blackboard
  • grades on issues that he is not supposed to grade
  • completely reversed his demants and topics

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

and limited grade detail make the signal unreliable.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

POLSC31 review
PS11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values