AI Rate Professor

Writing

Emily Brauer Rogers

WR2 · WR1 · WRIT2 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if and will put in the pages; avoid if you need an easy A with light work.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHeavy writingHelpful when engagedLong research paperExtra creditPolarizing
  • Writing load is heavy, including a long end-of-term research paper in WR2.
  • , and .
  • , and a .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

An A is possible with effort and , but many say she grades hard and WR2 is demanding.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

High writing volume and long research papers make the course demanding for most.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

as mandatory and showing up is tied to success.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Strong must-take and student fit.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

Several report hard grading and B grades for strong students; others say A is possible with work.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Multiple essays plus a 15-20 page research paper create a heavy writing load.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

65/100

, and very helpful, though .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Course centers on essays and a major research paper; little mention of traditional exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person WR1/WR2 with lots of essays; praise for help and clarity clashes with hard-grade and .

Main concern

Heavy writing load and inconsistent experiences with grading and clarity.

What students said

“she is a !”
WR2
“ if you want an A”
WR2
“A ton of writing. At the end of the paper you have a 15-20 research paper due”
WR2

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is writing-heavy with major papers rather than proctored exams; .

Essay-based15-20 page research paperExtra credit via writing labNo traditional final in some WR1

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person writing assessed via multiple essays and a long research paper; some WR1 .

Four essays plus research paperWriting lab extra creditNo final in some WR1
“She and at the end there is a 15-20 page research paper”
WR2
“ , so the last essays technically the ”
WR1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Emily is one of the nicest and kindest people you will ever meet in the teaching world! ... ! Great teacher, she is a must take!”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 in-person reviews, highlighting heavy writing, help availability, and polarized outcomes. Credibility rating: Medium.

📝 Writing Load

25/100

“A ton of writing. At the end of the paper you have a 15-20 research paper due so you decide.”

❤️ Helpful Mentoring

80/100

“ and is very good with setting time aside to help you with your essay.”

⚠️

35/100

“she grades hard and if u can”

👍

85/100

“Fantastic Professor! Extremely helpful and clear.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and
  • she often made no sense

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • if you want an A
  • it's not impossible to get an A
  • and still got an A

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • one of the nicest and kindest people
  • awesome, caring teacher
  • needs to learn how to treat people with respect

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven detailed in-person reviews from 2008-2012 show a .

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 51

Course coverage

WR27 reviews
WR13 reviews
WRIT21 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values