AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Denise Bailey

CHEM12B · CHEM101 · CHEM1A · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take her if and and can handle occasional moodiness.

Best fit · Effort For RewardStrong chem lecturesFair testsCan be moodyBreaks concepts downHelpful outside class
  • Most students call her a solid to .
  • and feel fair when students prepare.
  • Moodiness and occasional snapping in .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Some call it an easy A with memorization, but and .

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

, though O-chem and labs still demand preparation.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly state a .

in-person sample.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

and fair tests despite moodiness.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Tests are called fair and lecture-aligned; labs are sometimes graded tougher.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

and labs with preparation expected rather than light busywork.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Students praise board lectures, fundamentals, availability, and PhD-level O-chem insight.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

and .

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person chem lectures and and fair testing, with moodiness as the main friction.

Main concern

She can snap or make students feel dumb when they ask questions, especially in lab.

What students said

“I thought she was one of the BEST and most fair chemistry professors I've had at IVC.”
CHEM12B
“ and pretty straight forward.”
CHEM101
“She snapped at people and made people feel stupid for asking questions in lab.”
CHEM12B

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and fair, not described as open-book or heavily proctored.

Assessment risk

Standard

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students say tests track lectures, feel fair, and reward thinking rather than pure regurgitation.

Lecture-based testsFair testsThink not regurgitate
“ and pretty straight forward.”
CHEM101
“ , but she expects you to think, and not regurgitate.”
CHEM12B
“good since of .”
CHEM12B

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I thought she was one of the BEST and most fair chemistry professors I've had at IVC.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 in-person chemistry reviews, balancing praise for teaching with moodiness complaints. Credibility rating: Medium.

🧪 Teaching Quality

76/100

“Breaks it down to the basics. , but she expects you to think, and not regurgitate.”

👍 Recommendation

72/100

“ .”

😐 Classroom Mood

45/100

“She snapped at people and made people feel stupid for asking questions in lab.”

📝

68/100

“ and pretty straight forward.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • shes a really good chem teacher
  • Made chem fun to learn, kept you interested in the material.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It was an easy A for me, but she is very tough in .
  • , but she expects you to think

Theme 3

😤 About Personality

  • She can be a bit moody at times
  • VERY moody
  • if you asked her a question during lecture she would kinda make you feel stupid

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Nine mostly older reviews (2008-2011) lean positive with recurring moodiness notes, but sample size and missing grade data limit certainty.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CHEM1A4 reviews
CHEM12B3 reviews
CHEM1012 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values