AI Rate Professor

English

Francisco Gomez

WR301 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Consider another WR professor unless you want a harder writing class and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh graderUnclear assignmentsNo clear rubricHarder than expectedFunny but tough
  • Only two reviews and they split on personality but agree the course is harder than expected.
  • Writing prompts and .
  • Group activities and class.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Harsh essay grading and and unpredictable.

All .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Students say WR301 felt more like a tougher advanced writing course under his method.

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

reviews.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

One student likes his humor but both imply difficulty and ; .

Recommendation evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Reviews call grading harsh and .

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Writing assignments and group work are the main load; volume is not described as overwhelming.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Described as funny and interesting by one student, but and prompts hurt the overall experience.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Essays and .

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person WR301 feels harder than prior writing courses, with and harsh or .

Main concern

Unclear writing assignments and predict.

What students said

“He grades rather harsh and .”
WR301
“He really does not have a .”
WR301

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

No traditional exam policy is described; .

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews focus on essay grading without a .

Essay-basedNo clear rubricHarsh essay grades
“He really does not have a .”
WR301
“He grades rather harsh and .”
WR301

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person WR301 reviews with mixed personality notes and . Credibility rating: Low.

📝

28/100

“He really does not have a .”

🎯 Teaching Method

48/100

“Francisco Gomez is funny, and interesting teacher.”

📉 Recommendation

35/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Francisco Gomez is funny, and interesting teacher.
  • Be prepared for group work which involves pulling a card with a number

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • He grades rather harsh and .
  • This class was way harder then my wr 201 class
  • It feels more like a WR 2 class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two reviews from 2011, mixed tone, no grades or , so conclusions stay tentative.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

WR3012 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values