AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Shu-Yung Chen

MATH8 · MATH3 · MATHMATH · MATH3B · MATH2 · MATH1234 · MATH3AB · MATH3A · CALC3B · CALCMATH · 67 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

if you already learn well from textbooks and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard TestsSelf-Study HeavyPolarizingOptional HomeworkWeekly Quizzes
  • Reviews are sharply split between devoted fans and students .
  • Success usually means teaching yourself from the , and .
  • Common complaints include tough grading, rushed or , accent issues, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Even students who do all homework report failing or .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

26/100

Calculus and precalc with her are repeatedly called among the hardest math experiences, with fast or unhelpful lectures.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

48/100

Quizzes often function as attendance and students say showing up plus HW is the path that works when anything does.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Some call her among the best if you grind; .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

24/100

Many reviews call grading brutal or unfair, with and limited partial credit.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

quizzes and long exams that demand constant practice.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

supporters praise clarity and depth while critics say lectures are useless, mumbled, or demoralizing.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Weekly quizzes, multiple midterms, and long finals dominate; but exam-critical.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person calc and precalc experiences range from clear and rewarding for ; many report self-teaching and brutal exams.

Main concern

and uneven lecture clarity can crush GPA even with .

What students said

“ . She mumbles, her accent is terrible. .”
MATH3B
“Just put in the time to do the , and understand them and you'll do awesome!”
MATH3AB
“I am basically teaching myself!”
MATH2

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and , and often leave students short on time.

Hard Long ExamsQuiz From HomeworkOptional HW CriticalTime Pressure

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and exams are hard and long; many say finals have too many problems to finish.

Hard Long ExamsQuiz From HomeworkTime PressureNo Partial Credit Reports
“THE !!!”
MATH3B
“ .”
MATH2
“ and long, no time to check.”
MATH3A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . She mumbles, her accent is terrible. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 in-person reviews, balancing strong praise and strong warnings. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“I am basically teaching myself!”

⚠️ Recommendation Split

42/100

“ .”

📝

28/100

“THE !!!”

📚 Success Path

70/100

“Just put in the time to do the , and understand them and you'll do awesome!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lecture is pretty useless, read the book
  • .
  • She always says that she's so smart, we have to use logic

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Even if you do all homework, you can still fail in the exams.
  • easy A if u do the homework and ask your Qs
  • .

Theme 3

📝

  • .
  • and long, no time to check.
  • THE !!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

67

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty detailed in-person reviews across many years show a consistent and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 529
4 out of 55
3 out of 58
2 out of 59
1 out of 516

Course coverage

MATH218 reviews
MATH3A12 reviews
MATH3B11 reviews
MATH32 reviews
MATH3AB2 reviews
Show 5 more courses
CALC3B1 review
CALCMATH1 review
MATH12341 review
MATH81 review
MATHMATH1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values