AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Karsten Graff

CHEMB · CHEM1B · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
56/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

Solid if you grind the textbook problems and accept book-driven lectures; skip if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardTeaches From BookFair Exams If You StudyStrict LabsMandatory AttendancePart-Time Newbie
  • and review sessions so .
  • Labs are strict and students are largely on their own with little instructor support.
  • and book examples, and attendance was called mandatory.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

An A is realistic if you master assigned textbook problems and use the , but labs and .

All evidence is from in-person CHEM1B reviews only.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Content is standard general chemistry; difficulty is moderate when lectures stick to the book and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

while lectures mostly repeated the book.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Students and and lectures.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Exams are widely called fair or easy if you study; .

Format shift

In-person only; .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

and lab work rather than heavy projects.

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

and helpful; others say he reads the book, struggles with labs, and is still new.

Format shift

In-person only.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

as a separate strict component.

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person CHEM1B felt book-driven with fair, predictable tests if , but and mixed lecture quality from a part-time instructor.

Main concern

harsh or unsupported labs.

What students said

“ and tells you exactly what's going to be on the test.”
CHEM1B
“just know the example problems from the text book.”
CHEM1B
“ , because ALL he does for lecture is give you definitions and then works example problems FROM the book.”
CHEM1B

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and review material, with a .

Textbook-based examsReview sessionsCheat sheet on finalPredictable test content

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and practice problems; final allowed a one-page cheat sheet.

Book-based testsReview sessionsFinal cheat sheet
“One of the practice problems in the textbook itself.”
CHEM1B
“he lets a page of cheat sheet for final so .”
CHEM1B

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“just know the example problems from the text book. Those who did not , and rating him low are the ones who did not do the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 , and mixed teaching quality. Credibility rating: Medium.

📘 Book-Driven Exams

62/100

“Master the problems that he covers in the book and you will master the tests.”

🧪

35/100

“ own.”

📢

22/100

“ , because ALL he does for lecture is give you definitions and then works example problems FROM the book.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lecture is straigh foward and because he has his own hand wirting note for lecture.
  • Teaches directly from the book & has no clue how to do the labs
  • doesnt know chemistry, reads through book during lecture

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • . As other students said do the HW problem and you .
  • and read the book, and you should be fine.
  • he lets a page of cheat sheet for final so .

Theme 3

🧪 About Labs

  • He is a bit strick for the lab tho.
  • you're completly on your own.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen detailed in-person reviews from 2010-2011 show consistent themes but are old and lack grade data.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 55
2 out of 53
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CHEM1B12 reviews
CHEMB1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values