AI Rate Professor

English

Jason Marquez

WR1 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

if you want tough critique and can handle a .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderOpinionated CriticPaper Only CourseLove Or HateHigh Dropout Tone
  • ; .
  • Admirers call him brilliant and mind-opening; critics call him unhelpful and harsh.
  • Multiple reports of and low pass outcomes.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

and reports of no grades above C, so an A requires heavy effort with low odds.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Content is writing-focused but critiques and expectations feel intense and opinion-driven.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

available comments.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Strong fans and strong avoiders split almost evenly, so fit depends on tolerance for tough critique.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Repeatedly labeled a break a C.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Four papers and , but quality bar is high.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Some call him one of the best and highly intelligent; and class became torture.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

; course grade hinges on papers.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person WR1 built around essays and strong personality; polarizing on help and grading.

Main concern

and weak help leave some classes with very low grades.

What students said

“Oh, , just four papers.”
WR1
“None of them got above a C.”
WR1
“ , but rightfully so. .”
WR1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is paper-based with , so .

No MidtermNo FinalFour Papers

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person WR1 uses four papers instead of .

No MidtermNo FinalEssay Only
“Oh, , just four papers.”
WR1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ , but rightfully so. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person WR1 reviews with strong love-hate split. Credibility rating: Low.

📝 Paper-Only Structure

82/100

“Oh, , just four papers.”

⚖️ Harsh Grades

22/100

“None of them got above a C.”

🎭 Polarizing Personality

48/100

“He probably comes off as the biggest a hole in the world, so if your sensitive and don't like to be critiqued I . Great teacher though.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Prof Marquez is one of the .
  • What a character. Definitely not an average joe.
  • he is not a good teacher. in my class nobody passed

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • , but rightfully so.
  • graded everybody hard without assisting us with our improvements.
  • None of them got above a C.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only five older reviews with sharp disagreement and little grade documentation.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

WR15 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values