AI Rate Professor

English

J. Beach

WR201 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.7

The decision

Unless you are already a strong writer who thrives under tough critique, avoid J. Beach.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh GraderHard to PassUnclear ExpectationsAvoid If Possible
  • Most students call him extremely hard with few passing and little chance of A or B.
  • Multiple , and expensive unused textbooks.
  • A couple of older positives note patience for foreign students, but the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Students repeatedly say not to expect an A or even B unless already a talented writer.

Evidence comes only from in-person WR201 reviews.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

Nearly every review rates difficulty at 5 and calls the class very hard with few passers.

Evidence comes only from in-person WR201 reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

reviews.

Evidence comes only from in-person WR201 reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Dominant message is do not take him, with only two older positive quality scores.

Evidence comes only from in-person WR201 reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Students report , and little chance of high marks.

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Very hard writing course with high standards and expensive required books students say go unused.

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

, and the worst; minority note patience for some foreign students.

Format shift

In-person only.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Writing course focused on graded writing quality rather than described exams.

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person WR201 is widely described as very hard to pass with and limited support.

Main concern

, and reports of offensive comments.

What students said

“Unless your a talented writer don't expexct A or even B on his class....”
WR201
“ . He really was no help at all.”
WR201
“ .”
WR201

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews stress strict writing standards and hard .

Hard Writing Standards

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments do not detail proctoring but .

Hard Writing Standards
“If you want to pass then dont take him very very very very hard”
WR201

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 and avoidance. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“ . He really was no help at all.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

18/100

“ .”

⚖️

15/100

“Unless your a talented writer don't expexct A or even B on his class....”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • very very very very hard
  • Not a lot of students pass his class.
  • don't expexct A or even B on his class

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He really was no help at all.
  • Very hard and peeky teacher.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Concerns

  • He often makes racial comments that offends people
  • tells you to buy books that it costs too much and NEVER USED THEM.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Nine mostly consistent negative reviews from 2006-2007 with but old data.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 56

Course coverage

WR2019 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values