AI Rate Professor

Sociology

Jessica Alabi

GEN100 · SOH100 · GENDER100 · SOC100 · ETHS190 · ETHN100 · SOC100H · 128 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
28.36%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

; only take if you will follow every instruction carefully, start the , and can learn mostly from the textbook.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough GraderHeavy Reading LoadConfusing Final ProjectCondescending ToneLectures Miss Exams
  • and a if other work is strong.
  • Online and compressed sessions feel especially heavy, with dense reading and .
  • Many students say lectures and announcements do not prepare them for exams and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Many students still earn As, but only with , and a make-or-break final project that can fail the course.

Online reviewers stress the 5000-word project and harsh deductions more; a few older online posts called it an easy A with light work.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Content is GE-level but packed with , and especially brutal intersession pacing.

; short online terms feel the most intense.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

Online sections are often listed as non-mandatory, while many in-person reviews say attendance is required and .

Online evidence leans more flexible; in-person evidence leans mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

and most recent voices urge students to pick another GE professor.

A minority of online and if you follow directions exactly.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Tough-grader tags dominate, with reports of failing work for wording choices, small policy slips, or .

Format shift

Harsh project and .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

, and a semester-long research project make this feel far heavier than a typical GE.

Format shift

Online intersession and summer sections draw the loudest workload complaints.

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

Students often say lectures, tech issues, and .

Format shift

Some in-person students praise content-heavy lectures; online reviews are much more negative.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Grade hinges on and an .

Format shift

Same mix shows up online and in person, with project risk emphasized more online.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

some praise content-heavy lectures and note sheets, while others , and failing the class over final-project details.

Main concern

Strict final-project rules and .

What students said

“Dr Alabi was great for in person class! i understand why ppl who took her online felt the way they did bc her in class lectures are very content heavy”
ETHS190
“ . she makes a 3 unit ETHS100 class feel like 5 units.”
ETHN100
“If on the as she says you not only fail the project, you fail the class.”
ETHS190

Remote format

Online

38 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Most online reviewers call her a tough, high-workload GE option with , and tests that pull heavily from the book rather than lectures.

Main concern

and wording rules that can fail assignments.

What students said

“if you're looking for an .”
ETHN100
“She sends condescending announcements each week telling you if you don't follow instructions, you'll fail the class.”
ETHN100
“Her final project is a 5,000 word presentation that you HAVE to do well on to pass, but .”
ETHN100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes are often described as hard, timed, and poorly aligned with lectures, while the .

Textbook-heavy testsTimed examsHigh-stakes final projectTrick questions

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a final project strict enough that missing her exact requirements can fail the class.

Hard examsStrict final projectTest-heavy sections
“Her exams and the but not impossible.”
ETHS190
“If on the as she says you not only fail the project, you fail the class.”
ETHS190

Online

Online students report long timed exams, textbook-heavy questions, and a .

Timed multi-question examsTextbook-based tests5000-word final projectUnclear project instructions
“I had to take a 100-question exam less than one week into my course, and I had only 70 minutes to complete.”
ETHN100
“Her lectures/class activities wont prepare u for the exams. They have nothing to do with exams and youll need to teach urself the material from the textbooks.”
ETHN100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“if you're looking for an . every time i thought about this class i hoped my computer would explode.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting grading risk, workload, and . Credibility rating: High.

🚫

28/100

“Jessica requires a lot of work and requirement. If you are just doing a GE requirement, save yourself and .”

⚖️

22/100

“Even if you have an A in the class and a perfect score, but If on the as she says you not only fail the project, you fail the class.”

📚

36/100

“None of her lectures prepare you for the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures/class activities wont prepare u for the exams.
  • she's terrible at communication.
  • she also has a lot of attitude which can be fun but not when its directed at you.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • definitely not an easy class.
  • .
  • It is not an easy A class for GE.

Theme 3

📝

  • Her final project is a 5,000 word presentation that you HAVE to do well on to pass
  • . .
  • do NOT wait until the last minute to finish the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

128

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

50 detailed reviews across several years, with strong , and project risk.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 527
4 out of 526
3 out of 517
2 out of 520
1 out of 538

Course coverage

ETHN10038 reviews
ETHS1903 reviews
GENDER1003 reviews
SOC1002 reviews
SOH1002 reviews
Show 2 more courses
GEN1001 review
SOC100H1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

47 reported outcomes

A range

26

A+ 6 · A 18 · A- 2

B range

11

B+ 4 · B 6 · B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

9

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 5 · Rather not say 2