AI Rate Professor

English

Kate Mc Carroll

ENGL143 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
57.14%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Take her only if and ; skip if you need a chill Easy A.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing English ProfTough GraderHeavy Reading LoadEngaging When You Buy InSingles Out Students
  • fans call her inspiring and discussion-driven; critics say she singles people out and kills joy in writing.
  • and ; As appear when students match her expectations and put in real work.
  • ; online comments trend warmer and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Many students earn A-range grades, but tough-grader tags and effort, not minimal work.

Online reviews sound closer to easy A/B with steady work; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

Content is standard English/mythology with and essays; difficulty rises mainly from volume and critical expectations, not pure theory density.

Both formats report substantial reading; and annotations more.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Nearly every review that as mandatory with participation expected.

Online and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

54/100

; recommendation hinges on whether you want challenging discussions or a low-friction grade.

; in-person reviews are sharply split.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

Tough grader tags dominate; students report picky deductions and .

Format shift

Online feedback is described as good; and harsh.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Repeated notes of , and back-to-back big assignments.

Format shift

Workload ; online still warns not to fall behind.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Fans praise engaging, creative lectures and critical discussion; critics cite singling out, vague direction, and .

Format shift

Online reviews lean excellent; in-person quality is bimodal.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and participation more than formal exams.

Format shift

Same assignment-heavy pattern appears online and in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

some call her one of a kind with great lectures and feedback; , and crushing workload.

Main concern

, and reports of poor attitude toward grade questions.

What students said

“She honestly crushed my love for writing.”
ENGL143
“Put in effort and dedication she'll return it back ten folds.”
ENGL143
“The class is probably better suited for an already strong writer looking for a challenge.”
ENGL143

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and grades in the A/B range if you keep up.

Main concern

and ; falling behind hurts.

What students said

“just show up and do the assignments and you should get an easy A/B.”
ENGL143
“Professor McCarroll is very engaging and knowledgeable in connecting class concepts to the real world”
ENGL143

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mainly papers and participation with .

Essay HeavyParticipation MattersExtra CreditLate Window Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and readings; one student notes five small and five larger essays plus a short late window.

Many EssaysHeavy ReadingLate Work Window
“There are 5 small/5 larger essays that are ez if u dont procrastinate.”
ENGL143
“she assigns way too many articles to read and annotate”
ENGL143

Online

Online reviews emphasize assignments and participation rather than proctored exams.

Assignment FocusedParticipation Matters
“just show up and do the assignments and you should get an easy A/B.”
ENGL143

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you actually want to learn and implement skills, not just get an easy grade.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews (2 online, 12 in person), highlighting polarization in , and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“One of a kind professor, and actually engages with the class rather than lay out the material monotonously.”

📉 Polarization Risk

34/100

“She honestly crushed my love for writing.”

📚 Workload Intensity

28/100

“she assigns way too many articles to read and annotate just for ”

👍 Recommendation Split

54/100

“ . I was surprised how much I would enjoy it and the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her topics are very interesting and she engages in conscious discussions
  • She's young, bubbly, and super creative with how she presents materials
  • It felt like they were just making us do .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Put in effort and dedication she'll return it back ten folds.
  • The as she would mark things down for the smallest details
  • just show up and do the assignments and you should get an easy A/B.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Climate

  • She tends to single out certain students
  • She picks on students to make herself feel better
  • She makes sure everyone is included and is more than happy to help out when needed.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

14 recent detailed reviews show consistent themes but extreme polarization, so averages alone can mislead.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ENGL14314 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 4 · A 3 · A- 2

B range

3

B 2 · B- 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1