Is this an easy A?
EasyA
82/100Few graded items plus study guides and effort.
and two exams; in-person has more easy-A comments.
RLSTA120 · INTROLOGIC1 · PHILA100 · PHILA150 · PHIL12LOGIC · PHIL150 · PHILOSOPHYA100 · PHIL120 · PHIL100 · 31 lifetime ratings
The decision
Key questions
Is this an easy A?
Few graded items plus study guides and essay feedback make an A realistic with steady effort.
Both formats emphasize two essays and two exams; in-person has more easy-A comments.
Is the course easy?
Philosophy content can be dense, but lectures simplify it enough for most GE students.
In-person students stress lecture clarity; one online review notes long lectures.
Is attendance flexible?
Attendance is often not mandatory, but skipping lectures makes tests and essays much harder.
Most in-person reviews say optional but valuable; online is lecture-based without physical attendance.
Is this professor recommended?
About 85 percent would take again, praising knowledge, clarity, and fair structure.
Strong across formats; sparse online sample still positive overall.
Course guide
Grading
Lenient
74/100
Fair essay feedback and predictable tests; not a harsh curve for students who prepare.
Format shift
Consistent across formats with graded-by-few-things tags.
Workload
Light
76/100
Typically two essays, midterm, and final with optional reading if lectures are attended.
Format shift
Online journals in one religion course add work; philosophy core stays light.
Teaching experience
Excellent
90/100
Students call lectures amazing, organized, and better than the textbook.
Format shift
In-person praise is strongest; online notes long but clear lectures.
Assessment method
Balanced
55/100
Split between two essays and written midterm or final responses.
Format shift
Same few-item structure online and in person.
Luni fit check
Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.
Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.
Course format
Classroom format
High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward
clear, passionate, and enough to pass without heavy textbook reading.
Main concern
Can seem intimidating when students answer wrong; keep up with lectures.
What students said
“Professor Vulich is great at making convoluted philosophical concepts from the textbook (which he provides a free pdf of) easily understandable.”
“If you're willing to do the work, this is an easy A :)”
Remote format
Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro
Online sections use long recorded lectures with few graded items; grades may not appear in Canvas.
Main concern
Long lectures and grades not posted to Canvas.
What students said
“Fully online, a few lectures a week, and only graded on 2 essays and 2 exams.”
“I will say he does not put grades in Canvas though.”
Exam style
Exams are written responses drawn from study guides rather than trick multiple choice.
Assessment risk
Standard
68/100
Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.
In-person tests are written paragraph responses aligned with study guides.
“Tests are written answer, very straightforward from the study guide.”
Online exams and essays reported; no clear webcam proctoring details in reviews.
“only graded on 2 essays and 2 exams”
Student evidence
Top student voice
“Professor Vulich is great at making convoluted philosophical concepts from the textbook (which he provides a free pdf of) easily understandable.”
“Ability to describe and decipher philosophy is better than the textbook.”
“He only gave two essays, a mid term and a final.”
“He's great! Take him for any Philosophy class!!!”
Theme 1
Theme 2
Theme 3
Data context
Analysis sample
32
Recent reviews read by the AI
31
Lifetime ratings
84/100
Evidence confidence
32 detailed reviews over many years with highly consistent lecture and grading patterns.
Inside 32 stored ratings
Reported outcomes
25 reported outcomes
A+ 3 · A 12 · A- 1
B+ 1 · B 4
C 1
No reported values
No reported values
Not sure yet 2 · Rather_Not_Say 1