AI Rate Professor

Art

Gretchen Potts

ART101 · ARTA100 · ART1OO · ART100 · 34 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
5.88%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

if any other ART100/101 option exists; and tolerate disorganized, error-prone tests.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough graderUnedited hour-long lecturesExams full of errorsDisorganized onlineAI-zero accusations
  • Students overwhelmingly report unedited, hours-long lectures filled with ums and pauses.
  • Exams and instructions often contain errors, wrong due dates, and .
  • Many still earn A grades if they grind through work, but the experience is widely described as miserable.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Many students still report A or A+ if they complete every task, but tough grading, AI zeros, and and stressful.

Online students more often mention free-ish As with Discord answers; test and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Survey art content is not advanced, but unedited lectures, dense reading, and a 100-level class.

Both formats call the material fairly easy yet painful; online adds long required video watching.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

52/100

many online sections do not require live presence, while some sections treat missed work or participation as grade-killing.

Online evidence skews ; several in-person and hybrid-style notes still stress mandatory participation.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Nearly every detailed review warns students to pick any other professor for ART100/101.

and in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

; students report zeros for alleged AI, improper citation, note standards, and mood-based mark downs.

Format shift

Online papers draw more AI-accusation zeros; and mood inconsistency.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Hour-plus unedited lectures, heavy reading, multi-reply discussions, papers, and .

Format shift

Online workload centers on long videos and ; in-person still reports test-heavy time demands.

Teaching experience

Awful

14/100

Students describe uninterested delivery, unedited rambling lectures, non-response or hostile emails, and .

Format shift

Quality complaints are severe in both formats; online reviews are simply more numerous.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Tags and comments repeatedly call the course test-heavy, with papers and discussions also carrying harsh stakes.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize exams; online adds Lockdown Browser mentions and paper AI checks.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews echo the same themes of , and advice to take anyone else.

Main concern

and passive-aggressive grading make an otherwise simple art survey feel high-stakes.

What students said

“ !! Long unedited lectures that could honestly be cut in half if the .”
ART101
“Professor grades based on her mood. and .”
ART101

Remote format

Online

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

unedited 1-2 hour lectures, wrong due , and passive-aggressive email replies.

Main concern

Error-filled tests and when the material is basic.

What students said

“All of and difficult, requiring a lockdown browser.”
ART100
“Her . There were many grammatical mistakes on the tests.”
ART101
“You miss one assignment, you are getting a C for sure.”
ART101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are frequently described as hard, poorly written, and sometimes Lockdown-proctored, with little student-friendly design.

Error-filled examsLockdown BrowserTest heavyMismatched to textbook

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

errors and heavy grade weight.

Hard tests with errorsTest heavyUnclear wording
“ ”
ART101
“Grades are heavily on tests, a lot of time needed to do the class.”
ART101

Online

Online students report difficult, mistake-filled exams and at least one explicit Lockdown Browser requirement.

Lockdown BrowserError-filled testsTight timed finals
“All of and difficult, requiring a lockdown browser.”
ART100
“ and tons of mistakes.”
ART101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I'm UNLESS COMPLETELY NECESSARY save yourself the trouble”

Voice snapshots generated from 34 reviews spanning 2021-2025, highlighting consistent themes of , and . Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Overall Recommendation

8/100

“ !! Long unedited lectures that could honestly be cut in half if the .”

📉 Teaching Quality

14/100

“Professor Potts is clearly uninterested and "too busy" to properly care for her class.”

📝

28/100

“ time and have major issues with instructions and spelling.”

⚖️

20/100

“I received a 0 with the reason that it was created by AI?”

Theme 1

🎧 About Lectures

  • SHE WILL NOT STOP SAYING UM EVERY OTHER WORD AND HUGE PAUSES IN HER LECTURES
  • Long unedited lectures that could honestly be cut in half
  • lectures are from years ago that she hasn't updated

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You miss one assignment, you are getting a C for sure
  • and tons of mistakes
  • Professor grades based on her mood

Theme 3

💬 About Communication

  • her communication is non-existant
  • Lots of attitude and very very passive aggressive
  • She is extremely rude when you reach out to her

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

34

Recent reviews read by the AI

34

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

34 recent detailed reviews with strong thematic consistency across years, courses, and both formats.

Inside 34 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 53
2 out of 53
1 out of 528

Course coverage

ART10014 reviews
ART10113 reviews
ARTA1004 reviews
ART1OO3 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

32 reported outcomes

A range

13

A+ 7 · A 4 · A- 2

B range

8

B+ 4 · B 2 · B- 2

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

9

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 5 · Rather not say 1