AI Rate Professor

Communications

Nguyet Thomas

JOUR110 · CMST180 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
79/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
85.71%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you will show up; be cautious with JOUR110 if and flexible deadlines.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringParticipation MattersLecture HeavyOpen-Note TestsMixed by Course
  • CMST180 is widely called easy and smooth if you attend and participate.
  • JOUR110 splits hard: some call her awesome, , and tough deadlines.
  • She is repeatedly described as caring and willing to meet students to help them pass.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

CMST students often report smooth As for attendance and participation, while JOUR students work harder for B-range grades.

Easy-A claims ; the one online JOUR review earned a B with heavy help.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

, but , and journalism production add real effort.

In-person CMST feels easy; JOUR110 content is practical but time-heavy.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Nearly every review marks attendance mandatory with in-class work you miss if absent.

Evidence is almost all in person; the .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

, though JOUR critics warn of busywork and tough logistics.

Strong in-person CMST recommendation; JOUR in-person is polarized; online is positive but single-sample.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

66/100

Many call her fair and patient, yet .

Format shift

; JOUR in-person is stricter.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

CMST has solid weekly work; , and Coast Report expectations.

Format shift

Workload complaints concentrate in in-person JOUR110.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Energetic, knowledgeable lectures and genuine care dominate, with some friction over tech tone and syllabus clarity.

Format shift

In-person CMST is highly praised; JOUR quality swings from 1 to 5.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Mix of , and occasional pop quizzes.

Format shift

CMST ends with video projects; JOUR is more paper and quiz heavy.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person CMST students love energy and easy As; JOUR students either adore hands-on journalism or and rigid deadlines.

Main concern

journalism courses.

What students said

“Just show up on time and participate every once in awhile and you will get a smooth A.”
CMST180
“ though”
CMST180
“Hw is heavy with unrealistic deadlines and she won't give you an extension”
JOUR110

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The single online JOUR110 review praises pandemic flexibility and grade-rescue meetings.

Main concern

, so online experience is thinly evidenced.

What students said

“Mrs. Thomas will do as much as she can to pass you.”
JOUR110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

CMST tests are open-note and project-friendly, while and heavier testing.

Open-note testsVideo project finalPop quizzes in JOURIn-class assignments

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a ; JOUR can include pop quizzes and papers.

Open-note testsVideo project examPop quizzesIn-class credit
“ more than a day to do!”
CMST180
“ though”
CMST180

Online

Single online JOUR review focuses on support meetings and .

Grade recovery meetings
“ up a meeting and even assign work to bring your grade up.”
JOUR110

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Just show up on time and participate every once in awhile and you will get a smooth A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, separating CMST ease from JOUR workload conflict. Credibility rating: Medium.

🌟 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Prof. Thomas was energetic and knowledgeable. She went out of her way to make sure students didn't fail.”

👍 Recommendation

76/100

“I LITERALLY LOVE THIS PROFESSOR SO MUCH!”

⚖️ Course Split Reality

48/100

“I do not agree with any of the ratings this professor has been given.”

📝 Workload Warning

48/100

“the class is heavy with .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Amazing lectures
  • She really cares about the student
  • interesting stories

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • A very easy class!
  • smooth A

Theme 3

⚠️ About JOUR Friction

  • unrealistic deadlines
  • ton of busy work
  • Beware of pop quizzes

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen reviews with rich detail and confidence despite one thin online sample.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CMST1808 reviews
JOUR1106 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 4 · A 2 · A- 1

B range

3

B 3

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2