AI Rate Professor

Gender Studies

Jessica-Ayo Alabi

A100 · 31 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
9.38%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

if you have any other option for ethnic studies or gender studies.

Best fit · Self Taught ProAvoid at all costsHarsh unfair gradingPoor communicationHeavy writing loadCondescending feedback
  • Nearly all reviews warn students not to take her ethnic or gender studies sections.
  • Students cite unfair grading, cheating accusations, slow or , and .
  • Heavy reading, papers, and capstone or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Some students still earn A or B grades, but , and high-risk with heavy writing stakes.

Both online and ; online adds more cheating-accusation complaints.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

Content is not STEM-hard, but dense reading, papers, and a .

Online and and large writing projects.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

drops for missing first-day online work.

; in-person often marks attendance mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Only about 9 percent would take her again; the .

and in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Students report unfair grades, picky language policing, cheating accusations, and .

Format shift

Harshness appears in both formats; online emphasizes public Canvas criticism.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

, and a large research or capstone project stack quickly.

Format shift

Online notes 13-plus assignments and a 5000-word final; .

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Reviews describe boring , and unhelpful or condescending communication.

Format shift

Both formats are strongly negative; .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of textbook-based exams, weekly writing, participation, and a major research or capstone project.

Format shift

Online highlights long writing finals; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person students call lectures unhelpful rants, say exams come from unread textbook chapters, and .

Main concern

Lectures do not prepare you for tests and communication or .

What students said

“ .”
A100
“she accused me of because i have good grammar”
A100
“None of her lectures prepare you for the .”
A100

Remote format

Online

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews hammer missing grades, drop-for-attendance assignments, condescending Canvas posts, and exam mean scores around 58 percent.

Main concern

, and hostile announcements dominate the online experience.

What students said

“ . She accuses everybody of cheating”
A100
“she won't grade your work. .”
A100
“There was an at 7 AM, if you don't complete it you are dropped.”
21338

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

lectures, and sometimes timed tightly.

Tricky textbook examsTimed long examsHeavy writing finalErrors on tests reported

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and passing mentions rather than lectures, with tricky wording.

Textbook-based examsTricky wordingLectures not on test
“ .”
A100
“Absolutely nothing in the lectures are on the ”
A100

Online

Online exams can be long and timed with low class means; students also face heavy writing finals.

100-question timed examFinal mean around 58%5000-word finalTrick questions
“I had to take a 100-question exam less than one week into my course, and I had only 70 minutes to complete.”
21338
“The mean for the final was 58%.”
A100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . She accuses everybody of cheating, post's condescending announcements, does NOT grade fairly”

Voice snapshots generated from 32 reviews across online and in-person ethnic and and . Credibility rating: High.

🚫

12/100

“ if you can!!!”

⚖️

15/100

“she accused me of because i have good grammar”

📚

28/100

“the if u don't start working on it months before it's due.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“her teaching style is boring, fairly repetitive, and essentially a rant rather than actually teaching.”

Theme 1

😠

  • doesn't grade fairly
  • She gave me an F on an assignment because I use the word Hispanic
  • she won't grade your work

Theme 2

📚

  • gives way too much work for a 4 week ethnic studies class
  • The mean for the final was 58%
  • Each ch she assigns for

Theme 3

💬 About Communication

  • She
  • Prof did not respond to any emails after the first week
  • Do not even bother trying to contact her

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

32

Recent reviews read by the AI

31

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

32 detailed recent reviews with highly consistent negative themes across online and .

Inside 32 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 525

Course coverage

A10024 reviews
213388 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

31 reported outcomes

A range

11

A 6 · A- 5

B range

10

B+ 7 · B 3

C range

4

C 4

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 4