AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Kasara Heneks

MATHA120 · A010 · MATHA140 · MATH30 · MTH45 · A140 · MATHA180 · MATH140 · MATH10 · MATH100 · 30 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
61.29%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you will do the , and want a supportive math teacher rather than a pure free ride.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringExtra Credit HeavyLots of HomeworkSelf-Study RequiredStudy Guides Match Tests
  • and exam reviews that often mirror tests.
  • and many students still self-teach when lectures feel thin.
  • lower math often praised, calculus more polarizing.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

, matching study guides, and reviews help, but dense homework and .

Most evidence is in person; one online review .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

, but many describe dense homework and self-teaching in trig or calc.

In-person reviews dominate; online sample is too small for a separate difficulty claim.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

as mandatory, and several warn that skipping makes success much harder.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

64/100

Students who engage with homework and reviews often love her support, but and .

In-person sentiment is mixed-positive; online is split one-to-one.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Frequent and fair criteria help, yet tough-grader tags and .

Format shift

and ; online is mixed.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Lots of and often the main time sink.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

60/100

Many call her caring and , while others say lectures are slow, mistake-prone, or force self-teaching.

Format shift

critiques.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Multiple unit tests plus homework and to exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

29 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students repeatedly praise care, , Zoom reviews, and practice tests that match exams, while critics say lectures are slow or unclear and .

Main concern

and occasional tough grading can still demand significant self-study, especially in calculus.

What students said

“ and can be submitted for , which helps a lot.”
MATHA120
“I went through this entire semester having to every chapter and section through the ”
MATH140

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

one strong trig recommendation versus one harsh calc critique about inflexible policies and .

Main concern

Online calc feedback warns of , and .

What students said

“She is an amazing teacher who really wants to see her students succeed.”
MATHA120
“The material itself is easy, but as hard as possible, some are all word problems”
MATHA140

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are standard math tests, but practice materials and reviews often align closely with what is tested.

Practice tests mirror examsFormula sheets allowedZoom review before testsExtra credit mini-tests

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

similar to exams, plus formula sheets and pre-test reviews.

Study guides match testsFormula sheetPre-test Zoom reviewDrop lowest exam (some terms)
“ and can be submitted for , which helps a lot.”
MATHA120
“if , and bring your formula sheet, everything will go smoothly.”
MATH100

Online

One ; another says tests are made as hard as possible with many word problems.

Word-problem heavy tests
“ as hard as possible, some are all word problems”
MATHA140

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you put in the effort, you'll pass and learn. , and truly wants students to succeed!”

Voice snapshots generated from 31 reviews, highlighting care, homework load, and . Credibility rating: High.

❤️ Caring Support

78/100

“She genuinely cares for the students.”

📚

32/100

“She gave so , and her notes weren't helpful for the homework 70% of the time.”

🎯

70/100

“ and supplemental materials for !”

🔁

64/100

“100% would take again! This professor truly cares about your learning.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Ms. and easy to digest.
  • pretty much have though
  • Difficult to understand, drones on, doesn't teach from a text book

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • as long as you study it its an easy A, even for someone who sucks at Math like me.
  • Hardest class I've ever taken. I was only barely able to keep a B thanks to .
  • the semester.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Amazing and kind teacher! She went above and beyond to make sure students in her class got support.
  • , but I will not be taking her class again
  • and office hours.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

31

Recent reviews read by the AI

30

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

31 detailed reviews across several years and courses show recurring themes on care, , and balanced.

Inside 31 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 57

Course coverage

MATHA12011 reviews
MATH1407 reviews
MATHA1404 reviews
A0102 reviews
A1402 reviews
Show 5 more courses
MATH101 review
MATH1001 review
MATH301 review
MATHA1801 review
MTH451 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

28 reported outcomes

A range

12

A+ 6 · A 6

B range

10

B+ 3 · B 6 · B- 1

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Rather not say 2