AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Paul Yi

MATH030 · A30 · MATHA030 · MATHA160 · MATH045 · MATHA010 · MATH180 · CALCULUS1 · MATHA180 · MATH100 · STATC1000 · MATH45 · 35 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Fine for stats if you grind Pearson HW and ; avoid if you need lively teaching or .

Best fit · Effort For RewardExtra credit heavyBoring long lecturesPractice exams match testsLots of Pearson homeworkChill but monotone
  • Recent stats students often pass with practice exams and .
  • Lectures are widely called long, slow, and monotone.
  • Older algebra reviews are harsher; newer intro stats reviews are kinder.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

and EC for perfect HW makes an A reachable if you stay current.

Recent in-person and online stats reviews support this more than older algebra reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Intro stats can feel manageable, but some students still find pace and volume hard, especially non-STEM.

Online includes an easy MATH100 report; in person is more mixed by course level.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

yet some say it is not graded, so showing up still helps but rules vary.

Online more often forces presence; in .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

and practice exams while half warn about boring teaching and heavy HW.

Recent stats lean more positive; older remedial math reviews drag recommendation down.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

68/100

for and near-identical practice exams make grading feel student-friendly for many.

Format shift

Leniency is clearer in recent stats; older courses sound stricter.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Frequent long Pearson or point.

Format shift

Heavy HW appears in both formats.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

He is described as nice and available, but lectures are slow, monotone, and textbook-heavy for many students.

Format shift

Online and in person both call lectures boring while .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Online HW and completing platform work.

Format shift

Same software-driven pattern online and in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

30 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person he is chill and extra-credit generous for stats, but lectures drag and .

Main concern

and dull lecture delivery.

What students said

“His so make and quizzes.”
MATHA180
“The and there would be 18-30 questions with (a)-(h) questions in each”
STAT-C1000

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online ranges from ; outcomes depend on student effort.

Main concern

Boring lectures and .

What students said

“Easiest math class I have ever taken.”
MATH100
“His lecture style is very boring, and any attempts to increase class engagement were shot down BY HIM”
MATHA160

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, which lowers surprise difficulty if you prepare.

Practice exams nearly identicalFormula sheet allowedExtra credit from HWMultiple quiz attempts historically

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

75/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

tests and formula sheets are allowed.

Practice exams match testsFormula sheetZoom review before exams
“ similar to the real one.”
MATHA180
“Lets you use a formula sheet for exams as well as ”
MATHA160

Online

Online comments stress straightforward assignments and easy outcomes more than proctoring details; .

Straightforward assignmentsEffort-based passing
“Easiest math class I have ever taken.”
MATH100
“ .”
MATHA160

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is nice to give practice exams that are very similar to the real one. His so make and quizzes.”

Voice snapshots generated from 35 , and dull lecture delivery. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“his classes are super lecture dense. His teaching style is pretty slow and monotone”

📚

30/100

“The and there would be 18-30 questions with (a)-(h) questions in each”

📈 Easy With Practice Exams

62/100

“The exams.”

👍 Recommendation Split

50/100

“I would definitely recommend him to anyone that struggles with stats.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Chill Professor, his lectures were very long and boring.
  • Really sweet and caring guy.
  • He speaks in a monotone and makes it so hard not to zone out when he talks.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • One of the easiest class I have taken.
  • If math is not your .
  • Everyone gets 40 points if you do your work.

Theme 3

📚

  • ones.
  • Uses MyStatLab for homework and quizzes online.
  • of HW and there 2 a week.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

35

Recent reviews read by the AI

35

Lifetime ratings

74/100

Evidence confidence

35 reviews over a long span show a but older algebra classes create inconsistency.

Inside 35 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 59
3 out of 53
2 out of 56
1 out of 58

Course coverage

MATHA16012 reviews
MATHA1806 reviews
MATHA0305 reviews
CALCULUS12 reviews
MATH1002 reviews
Show 7 more courses
MATH1802 reviews
A301 review
MATH0301 review
MATH0451 review
MATH451 review
MATHA0101 review
STAT-C10001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

26 reported outcomes

A range

15

A+ 5 · A 10

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 2 · B- 1

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 3